Literature DB >> 12427389

Assessing the contribution of breeds to genetic diversity in conservation schemes.

Herwin Eding1, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Martien A M Groenen, Theo H E Meuwissen.   

Abstract

The quantitative assessment of genetic diversity within and between populations is important for decision making in genetic conservation plans. In this paper we define the genetic diversity of a set of populations, S, as the maximum genetic variance that can be obtained in a random mating population that is bred from the set of populations S. First we calculated the relative contribution of populations to a core set of populations in which the overlap of genetic diversity was minimised. This implies that the mean kinship in the core set should be minimal. The above definition of diversity differs from Weitzman diversity in that it attempts to conserve the founder population (and thus minimises the loss of alleles), whereas Weitzman diversity favours the conservation of many inbred lines. The former is preferred in species where inbred lines suffer from inbreeding depression. The application of the method is illustrated by an example involving 45 Dutch poultry breeds. The calculations used were easy to implement and not computer intensive. The method gave a ranking of breeds according to their contributions to genetic diversity. Losses in genetic diversity ranged from 2.1% to 4.5% for different subsets relative to the entire set of breeds, while the loss of founder genome equivalents ranged from 22.9% to 39.3%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12427389      PMCID: PMC2705437          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-34-5-613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


(To access the full article, please see PDF)
  18 in total

Review 1.  Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M A Toro; A Caballero
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.

Authors:  Pieter A Oliehoek; Jack J Windig; Johan A M van Arendonk; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  History and structure of the closed pedigreed population of Icelandic Sheepdogs.

Authors:  Pieter A Oliehoek; Piter Bijma; Arie van der Meijden
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Microsatellite-based genetic diversity and population structure of domestic sheep in northern Eurasia.

Authors:  Miika Tapio; Mikhail Ozerov; Ilma Tapio; Miguel A Toro; Nurbiy Marzanov; Mirjana Cinkulov; Galina Goncharenko; Tatyana Kiselyova; Maziek Murawski; Juha Kantanen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  Conservation priorities of Iberoamerican pig breeds and their ancestors based on microsatellite information.

Authors:  O Cortés; A M Martinez; J Cañon; N Sevane; L T Gama; C Ginja; V Landi; P Zaragoza; N Carolino; A Vicente; P Sponenberg; J V Delgado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Assessing introgression of Sahelian zebu genes into native Bos taurus breeds in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  I Álvarez; A Traoré; I Fernández; M Cuervo; T Lecomte; A Soudré; A Kaboré; H H Tamboura; F Goyache
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Conservation priorities of genetic diversity in domesticated metapopulations: a study in taurine cattle breeds.

Authors:  Ivica Medugorac; Claudia E Veit-Kensch; Jelena Ramljak; Muhamed Brka; Božidarka Marković; Srđan Stojanović; Hysen Bytyqi; Ljupche Kochoski; Kristaq Kume; Hans-Peter Grünenfelder; Jörn Bennewitz; Martin Förster
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Genetic structure, relationships and admixture with wild relatives in native pig breeds from Iberia and its islands.

Authors:  Luis T Gama; Amparo M Martínez; Inês Carolino; Vincenzo Landi; Juan V Delgado; Antonio A Vicente; José L Vega-Pla; Oscar Cortés; Conceição O Sousa
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Development of a high density 600K SNP genotyping array for chicken.

Authors:  Andreas Kranis; Almas A Gheyas; Clarissa Boschiero; Frances Turner; Le Yu; Sarah Smith; Richard Talbot; Ali Pirani; Fiona Brew; Pete Kaiser; Paul M Hocking; Mark Fife; Nigel Salmon; Janet Fulton; Tim M Strom; Georg Haberer; Steffen Weigend; Rudolf Preisinger; Mahmood Gholami; Saber Qanbari; Henner Simianer; Kellie A Watson; John A Woolliams; David W Burt
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Effects of pedigree errors on the efficiency of conservation decisions.

Authors:  Pieter A Oliehoek; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.