Literature DB >> 12426928

Changes in prescribed drug doses after market introduction.

Eibert R Heerdink1, John Urquhart, Hubert G Leufkens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The establishment of recommended dosing regimens has always been a difficult aspect of drug development. This paper examines the extent to which postmarketing prescribing deviates from initially recommended dosing regimens. We used the World Health Organization's (WHO) periodically updated compilation of the 'Defined Daily Dose' (DDD) to reflect prevailing patterns of prescribing in national markets. The aim of this study was to evaluate DDD changes over time (1982-2000) and to identify possible determinants of these changes.
METHODS: Data on DDD changes were obtained from the WHO's Oslo Collaborating Centre. We performed a case-control analysis in which we compared drugs with (cases) and without (controls) postmarketing changes in DDD on possible determinants associated with DDD change.
RESULTS: We found 115 instances of a change of DDD in the period 1982-2000 (45 (39.1%) increases and 70 (60.9%) decreases). Antibiotics showed the greatest number of changes in DDD: predominantly increases in the 1980s, while the 1990s were dominated by decreases in DDD of mostly cardiovascular drugs.
CONCLUSION: Changes in DDD reflect the outcome of a melange of forces, including misconceptions of dose requirements during pre-market development of drug and postmarketing changes in pharmacotherapeutic knowledge, clinical concepts, economic forces, and, in the case of anti-infective agents, changing patterns of resistance/sensitivity of target microorganisms to the anti-infective agent(s) in question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12426928     DOI: 10.1002/pds.745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  15 in total

1.  The use of clinical trial simulation to support dose selection: application to development of a new treatment for chronic neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Peter A Lockwood; Jack A Cook; Wayne E Ewy; Jaap W Mandema
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Changes in the defined daily dose; CYP2D6/CYP3A metabolism as an indicator for dose-setting problems.

Authors:  P Stolk; E R Heerdink; H G M Leufkens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Coping with changes in the Defined Daily Dose in a longitudinal drug consumption database.

Authors:  Vera Vlahović-Palcevski; Monja Gantumur; Nives Radosević; Goran Palcevski; Robert Vander Stichele
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-01-27

Review 4.  Bridging the efficacy-effectiveness gap: a regulator's perspective on addressing variability of drug response.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Eric Abadie; Alasdair Breckenridge; Bruno Flamion; Lars L Gustafsson; Hubert Leufkens; Malcolm Rowland; Christian K Schneider; Brigitte Bloechl-Daum
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  The pharmacodynamic and clinical trial evidence for statin dose.

Authors:  Simon B Dimmitt; Hans G Stampfer; John B Warren
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  How the EMERGE guideline on medication adherence can improve the quality of clinical trials.

Authors:  Lina Eliasson; Sarah Clifford; Amy Mulick; Christina Jackson; Bernard Vrijens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Effects of gliclazide dose escalation on postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A prospective, open-label, case-controlled, dose-escalation study.

Authors:  Poobalan Naidoo; Rambiritch Virendra; Mayet Layla
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2006-03

8.  Superior efficacy of new medicines?

Authors:  Johan C F van Luijn; Frank W J Gribnau; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Kwame N Atuah; Dyfrig Hughes; Munir Pirmohamed
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Discrepancies between prescribed and defined daily doses: a matter of patients or drug classes?

Authors:  Thomas Grimmsmann; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.