Literature DB >> 12425980

Stopover strategies in passerine bird migration: a simulation study.

Birgit Erni1, Felix Liechti, Bruno Bruderer.   

Abstract

Long-distance bird migration consists of a series of stopovers (for refuelling) and flights, with flights taking little time compared to stopovers. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that birds minimize the total time taken for migration through efficient stopover behaviour. Current optimality models for stopover include (1) the fixed expectation rule and (2) the global update rule. These rules maximize the speed of migration by determining the optimal departure fuel load for a given fuel deposition rate. We were interested in simple behavioural rules approaching the stopover behaviour of real birds and how these rules compare to the time minimizing models above with respect to the total time taken for migration. The simple strategies were to stay at a site (1) until a fixed fuel load was reached or (2) for a constant number of days. We simulated migration of small nocturnal passerine birds across an environment of continuously distributed but variable fuel deposition rates, and investigated the influence of different stopover strategies on the duration of migration. Staying for a constant number of days at each stopover site, irrespective of the fuel deposition rate, resulted in only slightly longer than minimum values for migration duration. Additionally, the constant stopover duration, e.g. 10 days, may change by a day or two (per stopover) without having a large effect on total migration duration. There is therefore a possibility that real birds may be close to optimal migration speed without the need for very complex behaviour. When assessing the sensitivity of migration duration to factors other than stopover duration, we found that flight costs, search and settling time, mean fuel deposition rate and the accuracy in the choice of flight direction were the factors with the largest influence. Our results suggest that migrating birds can approximate optimal stopover duration relatively easy with a simple rule, and that other factors, e.g. those above, are more relevant for travel time.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12425980     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  5 in total

1.  Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  How do energy stores and changes in these affect departure decisions by migratory birds? A critical view on stopover ecology studies and some future perspectives.

Authors:  Heiko Schmaljohann; Cas Eikenaar
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Fuel loads acquired at a stopover site influence the pace of intercontinental migration in a boreal songbird.

Authors:  Camila Gómez; Nicholas J Bayly; D Ryan Norris; Stuart A Mackenzie; Kenneth V Rosenberg; Philip D Taylor; Keith A Hobson; Carlos Daniel Cadena
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The amount of available food affects diurnal locomotor activity in migratory songbirds during stopover.

Authors:  Andrea Ferretti; Ivan Maggini; Sara Lupi; Massimiliano Cardinale; Leonida Fusani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Unravelling the processes between phenotypic plasticity and population dynamics in migratory birds.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Weipan Lei; Xunqiang Mo; Chris J Hassell; Zhengwang Zhang; Tim Coulson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.