Literature DB >> 12425791

Quantitative comparison of intestinal invasion of zoonotic serotypes of Salmonella enterica in poultry.

S Aabo1, J P Christensen, M S Chadfield, B Carstensen, J E Olsen, M Bisgaard.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the invasion of selected zoonotic Salmonella serotypes of poultry in an in vivo chicken intestinal loop model and also in vitro in epithelial cell cultures. Invasion was measured relative to a reference strain, Salmonella Typhimurium 4/74 invH201::TnphoA. Two serotypes demonstrated intracellular log(10) counts that differed significantly from all other serotypes tested: Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 being 1.5 log(10) colony forming units (CFU) (31-fold) higher, and Salmonella Tennessee being 0.7 log(10) CFU (fivefold) lower than the reference strain (P < or = 0.0001). A group of serotypes, which can be vertically transmitted, showed significantly higher intracellular counts (fourfold to eightfold) than the reference strain. The group included S. Typhimurium 4/74, S. Typhimurium DT104 (poultry and porcine isolates), S. Enteritidis PT1, S. Enteritidis PT6, S. Enteritidis PT8, and Salmonella Berta. The serotypes Salmonella Hadar, Salmonella Virchow, S. 4,12:b:-, S. Typhimurium DT41, and Salmonella Infantis, most of which are considered horizontally transmitted, did not show significantly different intracellular counts from the reference strain. Results from the cell culture invasion studies agreed with the in vivo data, with the exception of S. Berta and the poultry isolate of S. Typhimurium DT104.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12425791     DOI: 10.1080/03079450120106615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Pathol        ISSN: 0307-9457            Impact factor:   3.378


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence and characterization of multidrug-resistant (type ACSSuT) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains in isolates from four gosling farms and a hatchery farm.

Authors:  Chang-You Yu; Shih-Jen Chou; Chia-Ming Yeh; Maw-Rong Chao; Kwo-Ching Huang; Yung-Fu Chang; Chien-Shun Chiou; Francois-Xavier Weill; Cheng-Hsun Chiu; Chi-Hong Chu; Chishih Chu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Phenotypic and genotypic changes in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype typhimurium during passage in intestines of broiler chickens fed on diets that included ionophore anticoccidial supplements.

Authors:  Salvatore Scalzo; John E Corkill; David J Shanks; Timothy G Rowan; José Delaval; Andrew Fleetwood; Martin Murphy; C Anthony Hart
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  The early innate response of chickens to Salmonella enterica is dependent on the presence of O-antigen but not on serovar classification.

Authors:  Karolina Varmuzova; Marta Elsheimer Matulova; Alena Sebkova; Zuzana Sekelova; Hana Havlickova; Frantisek Sisak; Vladimir Babak; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Chicken cecum immune response to Salmonella enterica serovars of different levels of invasiveness.

Authors:  Angela Berndt; Anne Wilhelm; Christiane Jugert; Jana Pieper; Konrad Sachse; Ulrich Methner
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Gene expression analysis of Salmonella enterica SPI in macrophages indicates differences between serovars that induce systemic disease from those normally causing enteritis.

Authors:  Ariel Imre; Agnes Bukovinszki; Margaret A Lovell; Hongying Li; Xiangmei Zhou; Paul A Barrow
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.