Literature DB >> 12425755

Phase III trial comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to leridistim in the prevention of neutropenic complications in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide: results of the BCIRG 004 trial.

Jean-Marc Nabholtz1, Jacques Cantin, Jose Chang, Raymond Guevin, Ravi Patel, Katherine Tkaczuk, Pavel Vodvarka, Mary-Ann Lindsay, David Reese, Alessandro Riva, John Mackey.   

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial compared granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) and leridistim (formerly myelopoietin), a chimeric dual agonist that binds both G-CSF and interleukin-3 receptors, for the prevention of neutropenic complications in patients with breast cancer receiving TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy. Patients with metastatic (44%) or localized breast cancer (56%) were randomized to G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) daily (n = 135), leridistim 5 microg/kg s.c. daily (n = 139), or leridistim 10 microg/kg s.c. every other day alternating with placebo (n = 139). Following administration of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) on day 1, patients received growth factor beginning on day 2 until the postnadir absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1500 cells/ microL. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 21 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 7% in the G-CSF arm, 19% in the daily leridistim arm (P = 0.003 for comparison with G-CSF) and 22% in the alternate-day leridistim arm (P < 0.001 for comparison with G-CSF). There was no significant difference between treatment arms in the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia at some point during therapy (85%-88%). However, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 53% of cycles in the G-CSF cohort, 61% of cycles in the daily leridistim group (P = 0.063 for comparison with G-CSF), and 63% of cycles in the alternate-day leridistim group (P = 0.015 for comparison with G-CSF). We conclude that G-CSF is superior to leridistim in the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving TAC chemotherapy. The up-front prophylactic use of G-CSF is a reasonable supportive therapy for patients treated with docetaxel/anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12425755     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2002.n.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and growth factors.

Authors:  Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Anne Littlewood; Luisa M Fernandez Mauleffinch; Jan E Clarkson; Martin G McCabe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 2.  Epidemiology of treatment-associated mucosal injury after treatment with newer regimens for lymphoma, breast, lung, or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Jones; Elenir B C Avritscher; Catherine D Cooksley; Marisol Michelet; B Nebiyou Bekele; Linda S Elting
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Pegfilgrastim on the Same Day Versus Next Day of Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of Four Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Phase II Studies.

Authors:  Howard A Burris; Chandra P Belani; Peter A Kaufman; Alan N Gordon; Lee S Schwartzberg; Warren S Paroly; Seta Shahin; Lyndah Dreiling; Alan Saven
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Role of the progesterone receptor for paclitaxel resistance in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M Schmidt; E Bremer; D Hasenclever; A Victor; M Gehrmann; E Steiner; I B Schiffer; S Gebhardt; H-A Lehr; M Mahlke; M Hermes; A Mustea; B Tanner; H Koelbl; H Pilch; J G Hengstler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Evaluation of a novel medical device for pegfilgrastim administration.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Aruga; Hiroyoshi Doihara; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Takanori Ishida; Toshinari Yamashita; Kanou Uehara; Tetsuhiko Taira; Junji Tsurutani; Takashi Takeshita; Shigeru Tsuyuki; Koji Kaneko; Tohru Ohtake; Yusuke Yamaguchi; Yui Hara; Shigehira Saji
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.518

Review 6.  Repurposing Pharmaceuticals Previously Approved by Regulatory Agencies to Medically Counter Injuries Arising Either Early or Late Following Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Thomas M Seed
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  A phase III, randomized, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of biosimilar filgrastim versus originator filgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Roberto Hegg; André Mattar; João Nunes de Matos-Neto; José Luiz Pedrini; Sabina Bandeira Aleixo; Roberto Odebrecht Rocha; Renato Peixoto Cramer-Junior; Sylvie van-Eyll-Rocha
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Lin Chen; Fen Liu; Ning Zhao; Liyao Xu; Biqi Fu; Yong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.