PURPOSE: To determine the crystal structure of the neotame anhydrate polymorph G and to evaluate X-ray powder diffractometry (XRPD) with molecular modeling as an alternative method for determining the crystal structure of this conformationally flexible dipeptide. METHODS: The crystal structure of polymorph G was determined by single crystal X-ray crystallography (SCXRD) and also from the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern using molecular modeling (Cerius2, Powder Solve module). RESULTS: From SCXRD, polymorph G crystals are orthorhombic with space group of P2(1)2(1)2(1) with Z = 4, unit cell constants: a = 5.5999(4), b = 11.8921(8), c = 30.917(2) A, and one neotame molecule per asymmetric unit. The XRPD pattern of polymorph G, analyzed by Cerius2 software, led to the same P2(1)2(1)2(1) space group and almost identical unit cell dimensions. However, with 13 rigid bodies defined, Cerius2 gives a conformation of the neotame molecule, which is different from that determined by SCXRD. CONCLUSIONS: For neotame anhydrate polymorph G, the unit cell dimensions calculated from XRPD were almost identical to those determined by SCXRD. However, the crystal structure determined by XRPD closely resembled that determined by SCXRD, only when the correct conformation of the neotame molecule had been chosen before detailed analysis of the XRPD pattern.
PURPOSE: To determine the crystal structure of the neotame anhydrate polymorph G and to evaluate X-ray powder diffractometry (XRPD) with molecular modeling as an alternative method for determining the crystal structure of this conformationally flexible dipeptide. METHODS: The crystal structure of polymorph G was determined by single crystal X-ray crystallography (SCXRD) and also from the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern using molecular modeling (Cerius2, Powder Solve module). RESULTS: From SCXRD, polymorph G crystals are orthorhombic with space group of P2(1)2(1)2(1) with Z = 4, unit cell constants: a = 5.5999(4), b = 11.8921(8), c = 30.917(2) A, and one neotame molecule per asymmetric unit. The XRPD pattern of polymorph G, analyzed by Cerius2 software, led to the same P2(1)2(1)2(1) space group and almost identical unit cell dimensions. However, with 13 rigid bodies defined, Cerius2 gives a conformation of the neotame molecule, which is different from that determined by SCXRD. CONCLUSIONS: For neotame anhydrate polymorph G, the unit cell dimensions calculated from XRPD were almost identical to those determined by SCXRD. However, the crystal structure determined by XRPD closely resembled that determined by SCXRD, only when the correct conformation of the neotame molecule had been chosen before detailed analysis of the XRPD pattern.
Authors: Zedong Doug; Brian E Padden; Jonathon S Salsbury; Eric J Munson; Steve A Schroeder; Indra Prakash; David J W Grant Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Zedong Dong; Jonathon S Salsbury; Deliang Zhou; Eric J Munson; Steve A Schroeder; Indra Prakash; Sergey Vyazovkin; Charles A Wight; David J W Grant Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.534