| Literature DB >> 12424948 |
Abstract
MR imaging is well suited to evaluation of the pelvis. Ultrasonography remains the study of choice for the initial evaluation of a suspected gynecologic mass. MR imaging and computed tomography remain problem-solving tools that can help to characterize masses and stage gynecologic malignancies. MR imaging has the advantage of higher soft tissue contrast compared with computed tomography. This article reviews the MR findings of congenital anomalies and masses of the adnexa and uterus in adolescent girls.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12424948 DOI: 10.1016/s1064-9689(01)00004-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am ISSN: 1064-9689 Impact factor: 2.266