Literature DB >> 12424631

MR imaging of benign and malignant lesions in the buccal space.

T Kurabayashi1, M Ida, A Tetsumura, N Ohbayashi, M Yasumoto, T Sasaki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MRI characteristics of buccal space lesions and to discuss the sensitivity of MRI in predicting malignancy of those lesions.
METHODS: Thirty patients with malignant (n=7) or benign (n=23) lesions originating in the buccal space were reviewed retrospectively. MR images were assessed for the margins, internal architecture, signal intensity of lesions and their relation to the surrounding structures.
RESULTS: Two cases of soft tissue sarcoma were shown as ill-defined masses with infiltration into adjacent muscles and bone. On the other hand, all tumors of minor salivary gland origin, whether malignant (n=4) or benign (n=2), were well-defined and confined within the buccal fat pad without infiltration into surrounding structures. All haemangiomas (n=9) had very high T2-weighted signal intensity. Three out of them contained signal voids on all sequences thought to represent phleboliths, a finding strongly suggestive of the diagnosis. Inflammatory lesions were characterized by the presence of edema in the surrounding fat. When ill-defined margins, infiltration into muscles and bone destruction were used as the criteria for the malignancy, only two out of seven malignant tumors were correctly diagnosed (sensitivity 29%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although MR imaging was useful in demonstrating the extent of buccal space lesions, its diagnostic value in predicting malignancy was very limited. It was especially true for malignant tumors of minor salivary gland origin, which were typically seen as well-defined masses without infiltration into surrounding structures on MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12424631     DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  7 in total

1.  Gross anatomical, CT and MRI analyses of the buccal fat pad with special emphasis on volumetric variations.

Authors:  Marios Loukas; Theodoros Kapos; Robert G Louis; Christopher Wartman; Ashley Jones; Barry Hallner
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  A review of the gross anatomy, functions, pathology, and clinical uses of the buccal fat pad.

Authors:  Saad Yousuf; R Shane Tubbs; Christopher T Wartmann; Theodoros Kapos; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Marios Loukas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Is the buccal compartment a masticatory space extension or an anatomic space in itself? Evidence based on medical images and human cadaver dissection.

Authors:  Jorge Pinares Toledo; Roberto Marileo Zagal; Loreto Bruce Castillo; Rodrigo Villanueva Conejeros
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Characteristic power Doppler sonographic images of tumorous and non-tumorous buccal space lesions.

Authors:  I Ogura; T Kaneda; Y Sasaki; K Sekiya; S Tokunaga
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  CT and MR imaging of the buccal space: normal anatomy and abnormalities.

Authors:  Hyo Cheol Kim; Moon Hee Han; Min Hoan Moon; Ji Hoon Kim; In One Kim; Kee Hyun Chang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Color-Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of oral vascular anomalies.

Authors:  Gaimari Gianfranco; Fioravanti Eloisa; Cantisani Vito; Guerrisi Raffaele; Tenore Gianluca; Romeo Umberto
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01

7.  An unusual case of melanoma metastasis in the buccal space: learning by mistakes to distinguish it from salivary neoplasms.

Authors:  P Grillo; A P Savoldi; R Di Meo; G Granata; G M Rodà; G Arrigoni; A M Saibene; G Franceschelli; F Patella; M Cariati
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 1.852

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.