Literature DB >> 12424294

Spatial organization of receptive fields of V1 neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses to gratings.

Igor Kagan1, Moshe Gur, D Max Snodderly.   

Abstract

We studied the spatial organization of receptive fields and the responses to gratings of neurons in parafoveal V1 of alert monkeys. Activating regions (ARs) of 228 cells were mapped with increment and decrement bars while compensating for fixational eye movements. For cells with two or more ARs, the overlap between ARs responsive to increments (INC) and ARs responsive to decrements (DEC) was characterized by a quantitative overlap index (OI). The distribution of overlap indices was bimodal. The larger group (78% of cells) was composed of complex cells with strongly overlapping ARs (OI >/= 0.5). The smaller group (14%) was composed of simple cells with minimal spatial overlap of ARs (OI </= 0.3). Simple cells were preferentially located in layers dominated by the magnocellular pathway. A third group of neurons, the monocontrast cells (8%), responded only to one sign of contrast and had more sustained responses to flashed stimuli than other cells. One hundred fourteen neurons were also studied with drifting sinusoidal gratings of various spatial frequencies and window widths. For complex cells, the relative modulation (RM, the ratio of the 1st harmonic to the mean firing rate), ranged from 0.6 +/- 0.4 to 1.1 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SD), depending on the stimulus conditions and the mode of correction for eye movements. RM was not correlated with the degree of overlap of ARs, indicating that the spatial organization of receptive fields cannot reliably be predicted from RM values. In fact, a subset of complex cells had RM > 1, the traditional criterion for identifying simple cells. However, unlike simple cells, even those complex cells with high RM could exhibit diverse nonlinear responses when the spatial frequency or window size was changed. Furthermore, the responses of complex cells to counterphase gratings were predominantly nonlinear even harmonics. These results show that RM is not a robust test of linearity. Our results indicate that complex cells are the most frequently encountered neurons in primate V1, and their behavior needs to receive more emphasis in models of visual function.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12424294     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00858.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Measuring V1 receptive fields despite eye movements in awake monkeys.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Ferenc Mechler; Matteo Carandini; David Ferster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-29       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Neural coding of image structure and contrast polarity of Cartesian, hyperbolic, and polar gratings in the primary and secondary visual cortex of the tree shrew.

Authors:  Jordan Poirot; Paolo De Luna; Gregor Rainer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Receptive field structure varies with layer in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Luis M Martinez; Qingbo Wang; R Clay Reid; Cinthi Pillai; José-Mañuel Alonso; Friedrich T Sommer; Judith A Hirsch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-13       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  A nonlinear model of the behavior of simple cells in visual cortex.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Responses of V1 neurons to two-dimensional hermite functions.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Ferenc Mechler; Michael A Repucci; Keith P Purpura; Tatyana Sharpee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  'Simplification' of responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex: suppressive surrounds and 'feedback' inactivation.

Authors:  Cedric Bardy; Jin Yu Huang; Chun Wang; Thomas FitzGibbon; Bogdan Dreher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  A dynamic nonlinearity and spatial phase specificity in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  Patrick E Williams; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Direction selectivity in V1 of alert monkeys: evidence for parallel pathways for motion processing.

Authors:  Moshe Gur; D Max Snodderly
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.