Literature DB >> 12424279

OFF responses in the auditory thalamus of the guinea pig.

Jufang He1.   

Abstract

ON and OFF auditory responses were examined in the medial geniculate body (MGB) of the guinea pig. Single- and multiunit recordings were carried out on 12 anesthetized animals, and noise-burst or pure-tone stimuli were applied to the ear contralateral to the recording hemisphere. One hundred and thirty-five OFF or ON-OFF neurons and 160 ON neurons were studied, and the tuning curves of 21 ON-OFF or OFF neurons were examined from various nuclei of the MGB. The mean minimum threshold of the OFF responses (40.8 +/- 20.0 dB SPL, mean +/- SD; range: 0-80 dB SPL) was significantly higher than that of the ON responses (28.5 +/- 17.6 dB SPL, range: 0-60 dB SPL; n = 17, P < 0.001). Of 10 ON-OFF neurons that showed identifiable tuning frequencies for both ON and OFF responses, 7 showed a higher OFF than ON best frequency (BF), 2 showed the same BF for both ON and OFF, and only 1 showed a slightly lower OFF than ON BF. Most OFF responses sampled from the borders of the ventral (MGv) and the rostromedial (MGrm) nuclei of the MGB showed single-peaked tuning curves, similar to those of the ON responses in the MGv. The neurons located in the shell (MGs) and dorsal (MGd) nuclei of the MGB showed complicated-either multi-peaked or broad-tuning curves. All OFF responses showed long-duration-selectivity for acoustic stimuli: the mean half-maximum duration was 116.5 +/- 114.8 ms (n = 19, range: 27-411 ms). The latencies of 135 OFF responses were studied in various divisions of the MGB. The ventral border region of MGv showed the shortest latency, followed by the dorsal border region of the MGv, the MGrm, and the caudomedial nucleus (MGcm) of the MGB. The posterior nucleus of the thalamus (Po), the MGd, and the MGs showed much longer mean latencies of >30 ms (P < 0.05 compared with the border regions of the MGv, ANOVA), with Po showing the greatest mean latency of 60.3 ms and the greatest deviation of 25.5 ms). The latency of the OFF response (29.0 +/- 14.0 ms, n = 135) was significantly greater than that of the ON response (15.6 +/- 9.6 ms, n = 160, P < 0.001). The present results provide valuable information about the threshold, frequency tuning characteristics, minimal response latency, and duration selectivity of OFF neurons in the auditory thalamus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12424279     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00083.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  A possible role for a paralemniscal auditory pathway in the coding of slow temporal information.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Corticofugal modulation of the auditory thalamus.

Authors:  Jufang He
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Slow oscillation in non-lemniscal auditory thalamus.

Authors:  Jufang He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of cortical stimulation on auditory-responsive thalamic neurones in anaesthetized guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ying Xiong; Yan-Qin Yu; Ying-Shing Chan; Jufang He
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  In vivo intracellular responses of the medial geniculate neurones to acoustic stimuli in anaesthetized guinea pigs.

Authors:  Yan-Qin Yu; Ying Xiong; Ying-Shing Chan; Jufang He
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Learning and generalization on asynchrony and order tasks at sound offset: implications for underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Beth N Scissors; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 8.  Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates.

Authors:  Riziq Sayegh; Brandon Aubie; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Spectral and spatial tuning of onset and offset response functions in auditory cortical fields A1 and CL of rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Deepa L Ramamurthy; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.