Literature DB >> 1242426

Knee stability and knee ligament injuries.

A Kalenak, C A Morehouse.   

Abstract

Controversy exists on the relationship of knee ligament stability to knee injuries. Subjective evaluation of joint tightness or looseness has been proposed as a criterion for prescribing selective corrective strengthening or stretching exercises. Biomechanical studies of knee ligament stability were performed on 401 college football players from 1969 to 1971. Forty-three knee ligament injuries occurred during this period of time, 19 (44.2%) in "loose-jointed" players and 24 (55.8%) in "tight-jointed" players. Joint laxity tests were performed on 72 college football players; the distribution of college football players failing to perform each of the tests was quite different from that reported for professional football players. There was no relationship between the subjective joint laxity tests and the objective biomechanical tests of knee ligament stability. We conclude that it is not possible to predict knee injuries by subjective evaluations of joint laxity or by objective biomechanical knee ligament evaluations and that exercise programs based on subjective studies are therefore not sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1242426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  12 in total

1.  Assessment and evaluation of predisposing factors to anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  C M Bonci
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Anterior tibial translation in collegiate athletes with normal anterior cruciate ligament integrity.

Authors:  J M Rosene; T D Fogarty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Factors associated with injury proneness.

Authors:  R J Lysens; W de Weerdt; A Nieuwboer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Knee analyser: an objective method of evaluating mediolateral stability in the knee.

Authors:  P J Lowe; G A Saunders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  General joint laxity. Quantification and clinical relevance.

Authors:  L Dubs; N Gschwend
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1988

Review 6.  The role of biomechanics in the epidemiology of injuries.

Authors:  J E Taunton; D C McKenzie; D B Clement
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Does generalised ligamentous laxity increase seasonal incidence of injuries in male first division club rugby players?

Authors:  D R Stewart; S B Burden
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Knee anterior laxity: a risk factor for traumatic knee injury among sportswomen?

Authors:  Renata Vauhnik; Matthew C Morrissey; Olga M Rutherford; Zmago Turk; Iztok A Pilih; Maja Pohar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Generalized Joint Hypermobility and Its Relationship to Injury Patterns Among NCAA Lacrosse Players.

Authors:  L C Decoster; J N Bernier; R H Lindsay; J C Vailas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  A comparison of anterior knee laxity in female intercollegiate gymnasts to a normal population.

Authors:  T L Brannan; S S Schulthies; J W Myrer; E Durrant
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.