Literature DB >> 12424120

A duplication growth model of gene expression networks.

Ashish Bhan1, David J Galas, T Gregory Dewey.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: There has been considerable interest in developing computational techniques for inferring genetic regulatory networks from whole-genome expression profiles. When expression time series data sets are available, dynamic models can, in principle, be used to infer correlative relationships between gene expression levels, which may be causal. However, because of the range of detectable expression levels and the current quality of the data, the predictive nature of such inferred, quantitative models is questionable. Network models derived from simple rate laws offer an intermediate level analysis, going beyond simple statistical analysis, but falling short of a fully quantitative description. This work shows how such network models can be constructed and describes the global properties of the networks derived from such a model. These global properties are statistically robust and provide insights into the design of the underlying network.
RESULTS: Several whole-genome expression time series data sets from yeast microarray experiments were analyzed using a Markov-modeling method (Dewey and Galas, FUNC: Integr. Genomics, 1, 269-278, 2001) to infer an approximation to the underlying genetic network. We found that the global statistical properties of all the resulting networks are similar. The overall structure of these biological networks is distinctly different from that of other recently studied networks such as the Internet or social networks. These biological networks show hierarchical, hub-like structures that have some properties similar to a class of graphs known as small world graphs. Small world networks exhibit local cliquishness while exhibiting strong global connectivity. In addition to the small world properties, the biological networks show a power law or scale free distribution of connectivities. An inverse power law, N(k) approximately k(-3/2), for the number of vertices (genes) with k connections was observed for three different data sets from yeast. We propose network growth models based on gene duplication events. Simulations of these models yield networks with the same combination of global graphical properties that we inferred from the expression data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12424120     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  38 in total

1.  Coexpression analysis of human genes across many microarray data sets.

Authors:  Homin K Lee; Amy K Hsu; Jon Sajdak; Jie Qin; Paul Pavlidis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Inferring network mechanisms: the Drosophila melanogaster protein interaction network.

Authors:  Manuel Middendorf; Etay Ziv; Chris H Wiggins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Gene network polymorphism is the raw material of natural selection: the selfish gene network hypothesis.

Authors:  Zsolt Boldogköi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The topological relationship between the large-scale attributes and local interaction patterns of complex networks.

Authors:  A Vázquez; R Dobrin; D Sergi; J-P Eckmann; Z N Oltvai; A-L Barabási
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Topology of resultant networks shaped by evolutionary pressure.

Authors:  Avi Ma'ayan; Azi Lipshtat; Ravi Iyengar
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-06-19

6.  Emergence of tempered preferential attachment from optimization.

Authors:  Raissa M D'Souza; Christian Borgs; Jennifer T Chayes; Noam Berger; Robert D Kleinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inherent size constraints on prokaryote gene networks due to "accelerating" growth.

Authors:  M J Gagen; J S Mattick
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.919

8.  Degree dependence in rates of transcription factor evolution explains the unusual structure of transcription networks.

Authors:  Alexander J Stewart; Robert M Seymour; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Graph pyramids for protein function prediction.

Authors:  Tushar Sandhan; Youngjun Yoo; Jin Choi; Sun Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Boolean implication networks derived from large scale, whole genome microarray datasets.

Authors:  Debashis Sahoo; David L Dill; Andrew J Gentles; Robert Tibshirani; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.