Literature DB >> 12423459

Negative spiral CT in acute pulmonary embolism.

T Nilsson1, A Olausson, H Johnsson, U Nyman, P Aspelin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome of non-anticoagulated patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and no symptoms or signs of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following a negative contrast medium-enhanced spiral CT of the pulmonary arteries (s-CTPA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a 24-month period, 739 of 751 patients underwent s-CTPA with acceptable diagnostic quality for clinically suspected acute PE. All patients who had a CT study not positive for PE were followed up with a questionnaire, a telephone interview and review of all medical reports, including autopsies and death certificates for any episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during a 3-month period.
RESULTS: PE was diagnosed in 158 patients. Of the remaining 581 patients with a negative s-CTPA, 45 patients were lost to follow-up. 88 patients were excluded because of anticoagulation treatment (cardiac disorder n=32, chronic VTE or acute symptomatic DVT n=31, PE diagnosed at pulmonary angiography n=1, thrombus prophylaxis during diagnostic work-up or other reasons than VTE n=24) and 7 patients undergoing lower extremity venous studies because of symptoms of DVT (all negative). Thus, 441 patients with a negative s-CTPA and no DVT symptoms, venous studies or anticoagulant treatment constituted the follow-up cohort. Four of these patients had proven VTE (all PE) during the 3-month follow-up period. Two of the PE episodes contributed to the patient's death.
CONCLUSION: Patients with clinically suspected acute PE, no symptoms or signs of DVT and a negative single slice s-CTPA using 3-5 mm collimation, may safely be left without anticoagulation treatment unless they are critically ill, have a limited cardiopulmonary reserve and/or if a high clinical suspicion remains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12423459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  8 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: time to rewrite the textbooks.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Rate of computed tomography pulmonary angiographies (CTPA) positive for pulmonary embolism and predictive scores.

Authors:  M Albrizio; A Mizzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  CT imaging in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Joachim E Wildberger; Andreas H Mahnken; Marco Das; Axel Küttner; Michael Lell; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Clinical consequences of an indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram in cancer patients.

Authors:  Sara A Hayes; Gerald A Soff; Emily C Zabor; Chaya S Moskowitz; Corinne C Liu; Michelle S Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 6.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  M Riedel
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Effectiveness of MR angiography for the primary diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year.

Authors:  Mark L Schiebler; Scott K Nagle; Christopher J François; Michael D Repplinger; Azita G Hamedani; Karl K Vigen; Rajkumar Yarlagadda; Thomas M Grist; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  CT lower extremity venography in suspected pulmonary embolism in the ED.

Authors:  Jesse C Johnson; Michael D Brown; Neil McCullough; Scott Smith
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.