Literature DB >> 12423192

Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent fat in female college athletes.

Jason D Vescovi1, Leslie Hildebrandt, Wayne Miller, Roger Hammer, Amanda Spiller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the accuracy of percent body fat (%BF) estimates obtained by air displacement plethysmography (ADP) using the BOD POD Body Composition System compared with hydrostatic weighing (HW) in a group of female college athletes (n = 80). In addition, %BF estimates by skinfold measures (SF) were also obtained for comparison. A lean subset (n = 39) of the sample was also examined. Mean %BF estimated for the entire sample by ADP (21.2 +/- 5.9%) was significantly greater than that determined by HW (19.4 +/- 6.4%) and SF (18.8 +/- 5.5%). Results from the lean subset also revealed that %BF determined by ADP (17.1 +/- 3.7%) was significantly higher than %BF estimates by HW (14.3 +/- 2.8%) and SF (15.2 +/- 3.2%). The regression equation for the entire sample (%BF HW = 0.937%BF ADP - 0.452, r(2) = 0.73, standard error of estimates (SEE) = 3.34) did not differ from the line of identity. In contrast, the line of identity differed significantly from the regression equation for the lean subset of female athletes (%BF HW = 0.48%BF ADP + 6.115, r(2) = 0.41, SEE = 2.18). The results of this investigation indicate that ADP significantly overestimated %BF by 8% in female athletes and by 16% for a leaner subset of the sample compared with HW. It appears that %BF estimates by SF may be more accurate than those obtained by ADP for female college athletes, regardless of body composition. Coaches and trainers evaluating body composition should consider the use of SF before ADP when measuring %BF in female college athletes. Sports scientists should continue to examine the possible gender and body composition bias for ADP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12423192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission.

Authors:  Timothy R Ackland; Timothy G Lohman; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen; Ronald J Maughan; Nanna L Meyer; Arthur D Stewart; Wolfram Müller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Estimating body fat in NCAA Division I female athletes: a five-compartment model validation of laboratory methods.

Authors:  Jordan R Moon; Joan M Eckerson; Sarah E Tobkin; Abbie E Smith; Christopher M Lockwood; Ashley A Walter; Joel T Cramer; Travis W Beck; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of air displacement plethysmography to hydrostatic weighing for estimating total body density in children.

Authors:  Geo Claros; Holly R Hull; David A Fields
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Seasonal and Longitudinal Changes in Body Composition by Sport-Position in NCAA Division I Basketball Athletes.

Authors:  Jennifer B Fields; Justin J Merrigan; Jason B White; Margaret T Jones
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-22

5.  New Equations for Hydrostatic Weighing without Head Submersion.

Authors:  Jeff C Tesch; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Forrest Dolgener; Grant M Tinsley
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.