Literature DB >> 12422949

The effect of intentional expectancy on mental processing: a chronopsychophysiological investigation.

Ines Jentzsch1, Werner Sommer.   

Abstract

Expected events are processed faster than unexpected ones. Previously, we have reported evidence that passive expectancies determined by the preceding event sequence mainly affected the duration of motoric processes. Here we examined the effects of instructed, intentional expectancies in a two-choice reaction time (RT) task. As predicted, RTs were shorter for expected than unexpected events. Onset of the lateralized readiness potential as an index of selective response activation, and the latency of the P300 component of the event-related potential, reflecting the duration of perceptual processing, indicated that intentional expectancy affected the time demands for central processing but did not influence the duration of early perceptual or motoric processes. Together the present and our previous results provide evidence that different kinds of expectancy can be distinguished by their locus of action within the information processing system.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12422949     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00053-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  5 in total

1.  Cortical gamma activity during auditory tone omission provides evidence for the involvement of oscillatory activity in top-down processing.

Authors:  I G Gurtubay; M Alegre; M Valencia; J Artieda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential Impact of Emotion on Semantic Processing of Abstract and Concrete Words: ERP and fMRI Evidence.

Authors:  Sophie Pauligk; Sonja A Kotz; Philipp Kanske
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  What I Say is What I Get: Stronger Effects of Self-Generated vs. Cue-Induced Expectations in Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Maike Kemper; Valentin J Umbach; Sabine Schwager; Robert Gaschler; Peter A Frensch; Birgit Stürmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-14

4.  Knowing what to respond in the future does not cancel the influence of past events.

Authors:  Elisabet Tubau; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Lateralized readiness potentials reveal properties of a neural mechanism for implementing a decision threshold.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Patrick Simen; Leigh Nystrom; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.