Literature DB >> 12422428

[Discourse of primary care professionals of the Community of Madrid on group work: sense, aims, and intervention scope].

Juan Carlos Duro Martínez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health Education with groups is an increasingly important activity in primary care. For the purpose of contributing to the furthering thereof, this research is aimed at ascertaining the opinions of the health care professionals with regard to the group practices and particularly with regard to their reason for being, purposes and fields of intervention.
METHODS: From a qualitative-structural perspective, four discussion groups and four open interviews were held with general practitioners, specialists in Pediatrics, in Family and Community Medicine, Nursing and Social Work in the Primary Care Areas in the Autonomous Community of Madrid.
RESULTS: The opinions of the primary care professionals regarding the groups are confined to the activities of Health Education, this being an activity subject to individual inquiry. To form groups, the professionals include arguments on the order of hierarchy, efficiency, effectiveness and personal satisfaction. The main groups regarding which the group work was done are chronic patients (hypertension and diabetes), women (pre-menopause, general malaise), school-age children and teachers, community associations and caregivers of the chronically ill.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the primary care professionals consider the work with groups to be something on the side, the end purpose of which would be savings and, on a secondary scale, Health Education. These groups mainly regard chronic patients and women, community work being approached on a second plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12422428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Salud Publica        ISSN: 1135-5727


  2 in total

1.  [Attitudes of primary care professionals in Madrid in relation to work with groups].

Authors:  J C Duro Martínez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  [What do general practitioners think about evidenced-based medicine? A study with focus groups].

Authors:  María Carmen Sánchez López; Manuel Madrigal de Torres; Juan Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Juan Francisco Menárguez Puche; Enrique Aguinaga Ontoso
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.137

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.