OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the responsiveness of a newly developed generic questionnaire, the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA), which focuses on 2 aspects of participation: perceived participation and the experience of problems. DESIGN: Preliminary study of questionnaire responsiveness compared with transition indices. Participants completed 2 assessments, 3 months apart. To measure change, they completed 9 transition indices at the second assessment. One transition index assessed perceived change in general, the other 8 addressed 1 of the specific problem experience items in the IPA. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of the rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven consecutive persons admitted for multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment, with various diagnoses, were enrolled in the study; 49 persons completed both assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized response mean (SRM) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for participation domain scores and problem scores. RESULTS: SRMs and AUCs for the participation domains ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 and from 50% to 92%, respectively. The SRMs of the items on the experience of problems ranged from 0.4 to 1.5, whereas their AUCs ranged from 56% to 74%. CONCLUSIONS: The IPA detected within-person improvement over time, but its responsiveness must be confirmed in a larger study sample. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the responsiveness of a newly developed generic questionnaire, the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA), which focuses on 2 aspects of participation: perceived participation and the experience of problems. DESIGN: Preliminary study of questionnaire responsiveness compared with transition indices. Participants completed 2 assessments, 3 months apart. To measure change, they completed 9 transition indices at the second assessment. One transition index assessed perceived change in general, the other 8 addressed 1 of the specific problem experience items in the IPA. SETTING:Outpatient clinic of the rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven consecutive persons admitted for multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment, with various diagnoses, were enrolled in the study; 49 persons completed both assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized response mean (SRM) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for participation domain scores and problem scores. RESULTS: SRMs and AUCs for the participation domains ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 and from 50% to 92%, respectively. The SRMs of the items on the experience of problems ranged from 0.4 to 1.5, whereas their AUCs ranged from 56% to 74%. CONCLUSIONS: The IPA detected within-person improvement over time, but its responsiveness must be confirmed in a larger study sample. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors: Godelief M J Mars; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Marcel W M Post; Ireen M Proot; Ilse Mesters; Gertrudis I J M Kempen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Caroline S Kampshoff; Laurien M Buffart; Goof Schep; Willem van Mechelen; Johannes Brug; Mai J M Chinapaw Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Peter G Erdmann; Laurien L Teunissen; Frank R van Genderen; Nicolette C Notermans; Eline Lindeman; Paul J M Helders; Nico L U van Meeteren Journal: J Neurol Date: 2007-03-25 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Saskia Persoon; Marie José Kersten; Mai J M Chinapaw; Laurien M Buffart; Heleen Burghout; Goof Schep; Johannes Brug; Frans Nollet Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Miranda J Velthuis; Anne M May; Ria Ag Koppejan-Rensenbrink; Brigitte C M Gijsen; Eric van Breda; G Ardine de Wit; Carin D Schröder; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Eline Lindeman; Elsken van der Wall; Petra H M Peeters Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Mai J M Chinapaw; Laurien M Buffart; Willem van Mechelen; Goof Schep; Neil K Aaronson; Wim H van Harten; Martijn M Stuiver; Marie José Kersten; Frans Nollet; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Jaap Huisman; Tim Takken; Maurits van Tulder; Johannes Brug Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2012-06
Authors: Véronique R M P Moulaert; Jeanine A Verbunt; Caroline M van Heugten; Wilbert G M Bakx; Anton P M Gorgels; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Marc C F T M de Krom; Derick T Wade Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2007-08-27 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Jeanine A Verbunt; Henk A M Seelen; Feljandro P Ramos; Bernard H M Michielsen; Wim L Wetzelaer; Martine Moennekens Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 2.474