Literature DB >> 12422110

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with general versus local anesthesia: a comparison of cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality rates.

Christian De Virgilio1, Lina Romero, Carlos Donayre, Kelly Meek, Roger J Lewis, Maurice Lippmann, Christian Rodriguez, Rodney White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality rates after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA) repair with local anesthesia (LA) with intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia (GA).
METHODS: Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal EAAA repair between June 1996 and October 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with two or more Eagle clinical cardiac risk factors were considered to be at increased risk for a major postoperative cardiac event. Univariate and multivariate analyses for major cardiac and pulmonary morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed with respect to anesthetic type (GA versus LA), age, size of aneurysm, mean number of Eagle risk factors, and presence of two or more cardiac risk factors.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients underwent EAAA repair. The GA (158 patients) and LA (71 patients) groups were significantly different with respect to mean age (73 versus 76 years; P =.01) and mean number of cardiac risk factors per patient (1.2 versus 1.6; P =.002). No difference was seen in the overall cardiopulmonary complication rate (13% for GA and 19% for LA; P =.3), pulmonary complication rate (3.8% for GA and 7% for LA; P =.3), or cardiopulmonary mortality rate (3.2% for GA and 2.8% for LA; P =.9). The major cardiac event rate was higher in patients with two or more Eagle risk factors (22%) versus those patients with one or less Eagle risk factors (3.4%; P <.001), irrespective of anesthetic type. In analysis of patients with one or less Eagle risk factors, no difference was seen in the major cardiac event rate by anesthetic type (3% for GA and 5% for LA; P =.6). Also, no difference was seen in major cardiac events in patients with two or more Eagle risk factors by anesthetic type (24% for GA and 22% for LA). On multivariate analysis, the mean number of Eagle risk factors per patient (P <.0001) and the presence of two or more Eagle risk factors were associated with major cardiac and cardiopulmonary complications, whereas age, size of AAA, and anesthetic type were not.
CONCLUSION: No difference exists in overall cardiac and pulmonary morbidity and mortality rates after EAAA repair in comparison of GA and LA. The presence of two or more preoperative cardiac risk factors significantly increases the risk of a major postoperative cardiac event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12422110     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.128314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

1.  Use of dexmedetomidine versus general anesthesia for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Bertrand J Brown; Sammy Zakhary; Lindsay Rogers; Cynthia Ellis-Stoll; Dennis Gable; Michael A E Ramsay
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-07

2.  General versus locoregional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: influences of the type of anesthesia on its outcome.

Authors:  Yusuke Asakura; Hiroyuki Ishibashi; Tsuneo Ishiguchi; Nobuhisa Kandatsu; Manabu Akashi; Toru Komatsu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Endovascular aneurysm repair for an abdominal aortic aneurysm and a left ruptured common iliac artery aneurysm in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a case.

Authors:  Ryoichi Kyuragi; Takuya Matsumoto; Jun Okadome; Eisuke Kawakubo; Kenichi Homma; Kazuomi Iwasa; Atsushi Guntani; Jin Okazaki; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with general, regional, and local/monitored anesthesia care in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Matthew S Edwards; Jeanette S Andrews; Angela F Edwards; Racheed J Ghanami; Matthew A Corriere; Philip P Goodney; Christopher J Godshall; Kimberley J Hansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Endovascular repair of a large ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm using monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia.

Authors:  R W Franz; V J Nardy; D Burkdoll
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-06

6.  A multi-institutional, propensity-score-matched comparison of post-operative outcomes between general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care with intravenous sedation in umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  M M Vu; R D Galiano; J M Souza; C Du Qin; J Y S Kim
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  A Retrospective Analysis of Comparison of General Versus Regional Anaesthesia for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Özgür Yağan; Kadir Özyılmaz; Nilay Taş; Volkan Hancı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 8.  Anesthetic considerations for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Harikrishnan Kothandan; Geoffrey Liew Haw Chieh; Shariq Ali Khan; Ranjith Baskar Karthekeyan; Shah Shitalkumar Sharad
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

9.  Femoral Artery Closure Versus Surgical Cutdown for Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Jianlin Liu; Yanzi Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-05

10.  General anesthesia versus local anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Minsu Noh; Byung-Moon Choi; Hyunwook Kwon; Youngjin Han; Gi-Young Ko; Tae-Won Kwon; Gyu-Jeong Noh; Yong-Pil Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.