Literature DB >> 12422046

Assessment of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in childhood craniosynostosis.

Per Kristian Eide1, Eirik Helseth, Bernt Due-Tønnessen, Tryggve Lundar.   

Abstract

In this study, we explored two strategies of assessing continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings in children with craniosynostosis, namely either by computation of the mean ICP or by computation of the accurate numbers of ICP elevations of different durations. The ICP recordings of 121 consecutive patients with a tentative diagnosis of craniosynostosis who underwent continuous ICP monitoring were examined. The relationship between mean ICP and numbers of ICP elevations was defined. The distribution of numbers of ICP elevations between patients either undergoing surgery or conservative treatment was also compared, since the choice of treatment was heavily dependent on the results of ICP monitoring. At the time of ICP monitoring, calculation of mean ICP was the main parameter for assessment of ICP curves. After a median observation period of 16 months, the ICP curves were reexamined by means of the software Sensometrics Pressure Analyser, which presents the ICP curve as a matrix of numbers of ICP elevations of different levels (20-40 mm Hg) and durations (0.5- 20 min). Since the recording period differed between the cases, the numbers were standardized to a given recording time of 10 h, to allow for comparisons between patients. Cases with a borderline mean ICP during sleep (mean ICP 10-15 mm Hg) constituted 40.5% of the 121 patients. In this group, a rather weak relationship between mean ICP and the number of ICP elevations above 20 mm Hg was found, as well as a relatively high number of ICP elevations above 20 mm Hg of various durations. As compared to the patients undergoing surgery, a rather high number of ICP elevations above 20 mm Hg of various durations was found in patients undergoing conservative treatment. The study confirmed our hypothesis that in children with craniosynostosis, calculation of mean ICP does not describe the ICP curve in a reliable way. Decision-making should also include the computation of the distribution of numbers of ICP elevations, since this procedure represents a more sensitive strategy of detecting intracranial hypertension. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12422046     DOI: 10.1159/000066311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg        ISSN: 1016-2291            Impact factor:   1.162


  15 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Craniofacial reconstruction as a treatment for elevated intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Lissa C Baird; David Gonda; Steven R Cohen; Lars H Evers; Nathalie LeFloch; Michael L Levy; Hal S Meltzer
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Intracranial volume and whole brain volume in infants with unicoronal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hill; S Vaddi; Amanda Moffitt; A A Kane; Jeffrey L Marsh; Jayesh Panchal; Joan T Richtsmeier; Kristina Aldridge
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-08-10

Review 4.  Complex craniosynostoses: a review of the prominent clinical features and the related management strategies.

Authors:  G Tamburrini; M Caldarelli; L Massimi; G Gasparini; S Pelo; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in children with single suture and complex craniosynostosis: a review.

Authors:  G Tamburrini; M Caldarelli; L Massimi; P Santini; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Comparison of craniofacial phenotype in craniosynostotic rabbits treated with anti-Tgf-beta2 at suturectomy site.

Authors:  Brenda C Frazier; Mark P Mooney; H Wolfgang Losken; Tim Barbano; Amr Moursi; Michael I Siegel; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-12-31

7.  Intraoperative pre- and post-craniofacial reconstruction intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in children with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Yokote; Yasuo Aihara; Seiichiro Eguchi; Yoshikazu Okada
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Evaluation of Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Children.

Authors:  Jordan W Swanson; Tomas S Aleman; Wen Xu; Gui-Shuang Ying; Wei Pan; Grant T Liu; Shih-Shan Lang; Gregory G Heuer; Phillip B Storm; Scott P Bartlett; William R Katowitz; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 9.  Non-traumatic pediatric intracranial hypertension: key points for different etiologies, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Nir Shimony; Meleine Martinez-Sosa; Brooks Osburn; George I Jallo
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 10.  Metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Jacques van der Meulen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.