Literature DB >> 12421773

The MRC CRASH Trial: study design, baseline data, and outcome in 1000 randomised patients in the pilot phase.

P Edwards1, B Farrell, G Lomas, R Mashru, N Ritchie, I Roberts, P Sandercock, J Wasserberg, D Yates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the design and feasibility of a large scale multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a high dose corticosteroid infusion after head injury. To assess whether large numbers of patients could be enrolled and treated within eight hours from injury and then followed up at six months.
METHODS: Randomised placebo controlled multicentre trial of a 48 hour corticosteroid infusion after significant head injury. All head injured adults who were observed while in hospital to have GCS of 14 or less (out of a maximum score of 15), and who were within eight hours of the injury, were eligible for trial entry. Analysis of baseline and outcome data (for both treatment groups combined) for 1000 patients enrolled in the pilot phase of the MRC CRASH Trial.
RESULTS: Fifty two hospitals in 14 countries participated in the pilot phase, recruiting an average of one patient per hospital per month. Of the 1000 randomised patients, 330 (33%) had mild head injury, 289 (29%) had moderate head injury, and 381 (38%) had severe head injury. Seven hundred and nine (71%) patients were randomised within three hours of injury. Outcome at two weeks from injury was known for 991 (99%) patients, of whom 170 (17%) patients died. At the time of writing, six month follow up for the first 500 patients was nearly complete. Vital status was known for 465 (93%) of the 500 patients, of whom 97 (21%) had died. Functional status based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale was known for 438 (88%) of the 500 patients: 21% were dead, 17% were severely disabled, 22% were moderately disabled, and 34% had made a good recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: The trial procedures proved practicable and a wide variety of patients were recruited in the emergency department within eight hours of injury. Using simple outcome measures, large numbers of patients can be successfully followed up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12421773      PMCID: PMC1756291          DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.6.510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

Review 1.  Corticosteroids in head injury--the CRASH trial.

Authors:  D Yates; B Farrell; G Teasdale; P Sandercock; I Roberts
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  Corticosteroids in acute traumatic brain injury: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  P Alderson; I Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-28

Review 4.  Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies.

Authors:  K Dickinson; F Bunn; R Wentz; P Edwards; I Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-13

5.  "Ultrahigh" dexamethasone in acute brain injury. Results from a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter trial (GUDHIS). German Ultrahigh Dexamethasone Head Injury Study Group.

Authors:  M R Gaab; H A Trost; A Alcantara; A Karimi-Nejad; D Moskopp; R Schultheiss; W J Bock; J Piek; H Klinge; F Scheil
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  1994

6.  Current application of "high-dose" steroid therapy for CNS injury. A pharmacological perspective.

Authors:  J M Braughler; E D Hall
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Allocation of patients to treatment groups in a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  S J White; L S Freedman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Treating head injuries. Outcomes in specialist units using protocols may not be better.

Authors:  Vincenzo Bonicalzi; Sergio Canavero
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

2.  Treating head injuries.

Authors:  Jonathan Wasserberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-31

Review 3.  Neuro-ophthalmic deficits after head trauma.

Authors:  Sarah M Jacobs; Gregory P Van Stavern
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  The Best Services Trial (BeST?): a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of New Orleans Intervention Model with services as usual (SAU) for infants and young children entering care.

Authors:  Karen Crawford; Bridie Fitzpatick; Lynn McMahon; Matt Forde; Susanne Miller; Alex McConnachie; Martina Messow; Marion Henderson; Emma McIntosh; Kathleen Boyd; Dennis Ougrin; Phil Wilson; Nicholas Watson; Helen Minnis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Pituitary function within the first year after traumatic brain injury or subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  A Tölli; J Borg; B-M Bellander; F Johansson; C Höybye
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Outcomes after Traumatic Brain Injury with Concomitant Severe Extracranial Injuries.

Authors:  Tomoo Watanabe; Yasuyuki Kawai; Asami Iwamura; Naoki Maegawa; Hidetada Fukushima; Kazuo Okuchi
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 1.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.