Literature DB >> 12420413

The evolution of breast cancer risk assessment.

Alan B Hollingsworth1, Sharon Nall, Danielle Dill.   

Abstract

Breast cancer risk assessment is in the process of refinement, largely due to the potential for pharmacologic risk reduction. In the 1970s, benign tissue changes were assigned relative risk (RR) values. The 1980s witnessed the introduction of mathematical models for calculating risk. Genetic counseling and testing appeared in the 1990s. Now in 2002, we are witnessing efforts to improve risk assessment by actively searching for cellular 'atypia' through nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), ductal lavage, and random fine needle aspiration (FNA). One deficiency plagues any approach to predicting breast cancer based on historical risk factors--exclusion of the 70% majority of women who develop breast cancer without any identifiable risk factors. Realizing that the long-term goal of breast cancer risk assessment should be tissue and/or serum-based strategies, the authors introduce the Oklahoma Breast Cancer Project, a tissue bank designed to augment research devoted to molecular biologic markers of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12420413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc        ISSN: 0030-1876


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genomic Changes in Normal Breast Tissue in Women at Normal Risk or at High Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David N Danforth
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-08-17

Review 2.  The intraductal approach to the breast: raison d'être.

Authors:  Bonnie L King; Susan M Love
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 6.466

3.  A descriptive study of variables associated with obtaining nipple aspirate fluid in a cohort of non-lactating women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Baltzell; Margaret Wrensch; Jennette D Sison
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  An Improved Breast Epithelial Sampling Method for Molecular Profiling and Biomarker Analysis in Women at Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David N Danforth; Andrew C Warner; Darawalee Wangsa; Thomas Ried; Dominik Duelli; Armando C Filie; Sheila A Prindiville
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-06-08

5.  Characteristics of Breast Ducts in Normal-Risk and High-risk Women and Their Relationship to Ductal Cytologic Atypia.

Authors:  David N Danforth; Armando C Filie; Andrew C Warner; George W Wright; Zhonghe Sun; Thomas Ried; Christine T McGowan; Sheila A Prindiville
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.