Literature DB >> 12419435

Effects on functional outcome after IORT-containing multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Guido H H Mannaerts1, Harm J T Rutten, Hendrik Martijn, Patrick E J Hanssens, Theo Wiggers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer, much attention is focused on the oncologic outcome. Little is known about the functional outcome. In this study, the functional outcome after a multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer is analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1994 and 1999, 55 patients with locally advanced primary and 66 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with high-dose preoperative external beam irradiation, followed by extended surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy. To assess long-term functional outcome, all patients still alive (n = 97) were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding ongoing morbidity, as well as functional and social impairment. Seventy-six of the 79 patients (96%) returned the questionnaire. The median follow-up was 14 months (range: 4-60 months).
RESULTS: The questionnaire revealed fatigue in 44%, perineal pain in 42%, radiating pain in the leg(s) in 21%, walking difficulties in 36%, and voiding dysfunction in 42% of the patients as symptoms of ongoing morbidity. Functional impairment consisted of requiring help with basic activities in 15% and sexual inactivity in 56% of the respondents. Social handicap was demonstrated by loss of former lifestyle in 44% and loss of professional occupation in 40% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: As a result of multimodality treatment, the majority of these patients have to deal with long-term physical morbidity, the need for help with daily care, and considerable social impairment. These consequences must be weighed against the chance of cure if the patient is treated and the disability eventually caused by uncontrolled tumor progression if the patient is not treated. These potential drawbacks should be discussed with the patient preoperatively and taken into account when designing a treatment strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12419435     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03012-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  Standard fractionation external beam radiotherapy with and without intraoperative radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer: the role of local therapy in patients with a high competing risk of death from distant disease.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Justin C Voog; Jonathan Wiseman; Ryan R Cook; Marek Ancukiewicz; Percy Lee; David P Ryan; Jeffrey W Clark; David L Berger; James C Cusack; Jennifer Y Wo; Theodore S Hong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Research opportunities in intraoperative radiation therapy: the next decade 2013-2023.

Authors:  F A Calvo; C V Sole; M E González; E D Tangco; J López-Tarjuelo; I Koubychine; J A Santos; J Pascau; R Herranz; C Ferrer
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Quality-of-life and surgical treatments for rectal cancer--a longitudinal analysis using the California Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Julie Smith-Gagen; Rosemary D Cress; Christiana M Drake; Patrick S Romano; Kathleen J Yost; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Implementation of an intraoperative electron radiotherapy in vivo dosimetry program.

Authors:  Juan López-Tarjuelo; Virginia Morillo-Macías; Ana Bouché-Babiloni; Enrique Boldó-Roda; Rafael Lozoya-Albacar; Carlos Ferrer-Albiach
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.