Literature DB >> 12418029

An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line.

Tsui-Hsien Huang1, Ching-Yi Tsai, Shiow-Ling Chen, Chia-Tze Kao.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the cytotoxic effects of three different kinds of orthodontic adhesive on a human primary gingival fibroblast culture (GF) and a human oral cancer-cell line (OC2). The adhesives comprised a self-cure bonding resin, a light-cure bonding resin, and a hybrid glass ionomer. Any differences between the cytotoxic potencies of eluates of the orthodontic materials on GF and OC2 cells were quantified colorimetrically (MTT test). The results are as follows: For the hybrid glass ionomer, the survival rate of GF cells exposed to the liquid component revealed a significant dose-dependent decrease (p < 0.05). The liquid component and the mixed hybrid glass-ionomer material reflected a significant dose-dependent decrease (p < 0.05) in exposed OC2 cell survival. Associated with an increase in the cell exposure concentration of Resin A, Resin B, Paste A, Paste B, Resin A + B, Paste A + B and the set material of the self-cure resin adhesive, was a significant decrease in survival rate for cultured GF and OC2 cells (p < 0.05). Associated with an increase in the concentration of the primer, paste, and mixed material of the light-cure resin adhesive to which test cells were exposed, the survival rate reflected a decrease for GF cells (p < 0.05). The survival rate of cells exposed to light-cure resin paste reflected no difference for OC2 cells. It is concluded that the liquid of the hybrid glass-ionomer cement, Resin A and Resin B and Resin A + B of the self-cure resin and the primer of the light-cure resin are toxic agents to the GF and OC2 cell lines. Primary human gingival fibroblasts were found to be more sensitive than the tested human oral carcinoma cell line from most of the substances. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12418029     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.10412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  6 in total

1.  Independent [Ca2+]i increases and cell proliferation induced by the carcinogen safrole in human oral cancer cells.

Authors:  Jong-Khing Huang; Chun-Jen Huang; Wei-Chuan Chen; Shiuh-Inn Liu; Shu-Shong Hsu; Hong-Tai Chang; Li-Ling Tseng; Chiang-Ting Chou; Chih-Hung Chang; Chung-Ren Jan
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Orthodontic bracket designs and their impact on microbial profile and periodontal disease: A clinical trial.

Authors:  Nikesh N Moolya; Arvind Shetty; Neha Gupta; Anvesha Gupta; Vivek Jalan; Rashmi Sharma
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-10

3.  Antimicrobial and fluoride release capacity of orthodontic bonding materials.

Authors:  Érika Machado Caldeira; Amanda Osório; Edna Lúcia Couto Oberosler; Delmo Santiago Vaitsman; Daniela Sales Alviano; Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves Nojima
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Cytotoxic effects of orthodontic composites.

Authors:  Siddik Malkoc; Bayram Corekci; Hayriye Esra Ulker; Muhammet Yalçin; Abdülkadir Sengün
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Cytotoxic effects of resin-modified orthodontic band adhesives. Are they safe?

Authors:  Siddik Malkoc; Bayram Corekci; Hayriye Esra Botsali; Muhammet Yalçin; Abdülkadir Sengun
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental and orthodontic light-cured composite resins.

Authors:  Raoul Bationo; Ablassé Rouamba; Abdoulaziz Diarra; Monique Lydie Ahia Beugré-Kouassi; Jean-Bertin Beugré; Fabienne Jordana
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-10-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.