Literature DB >> 12417544

Relation of ejection fraction and inducible ventricular tachycardia to mode of death in patients with coronary artery disease: an analysis of patients enrolled in the multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial.

Alfred E Buxton1, Kerry L Lee, Gail E Hafley, D George Wyse, John D Fisher, Michael H Lehmann, Luis A Pires, Michael R Gold, Douglas L Packer, Mark E Josephson, Eric N Prystowsky, Mario R Talajic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fifty percent of deaths in patients with coronary disease occur suddenly. Although many factors correlate with increased mortality, there is little information regarding the influence of these factors on mode of death. As such, optimum methods to determine patients most likely to benefit from implantable defibrillator therapy are unclear. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed the relation of ejection fraction and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias to mode of death in all 1791 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy. Total mortality and arrhythmic deaths/cardiac arrests occurred more frequently in patients with ejection fraction <30% than in those with ejection fraction of 30% to 40%. The percentage of deaths classified as arrhythmic was similar in patients with ejection fraction <30% or > or =30%. The relative contribution of arrhythmic events to total mortality was significantly higher in patients with inducible tachyarrhythmia (58% of deaths in inducible patients versus 46% in noninducible patients, P=0.004). The higher percentage of events that were arrhythmic among patients with inducible tachyarrhythmia appeared more distinct among patients with an ejection fraction > or =30% (61% of events were arrhythmic among inducible patients with ejection fraction > or =30% and only 42% among noninducible patients, P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Both low ejection fraction and inducible tachyarrhythmias identify patients with coronary disease at increased mortality risk. Ejection fraction does not discriminate between modes of death, whereas inducible tachyarrhythmia identifies patients for whom death, if it occurs, is significantly more likely to be arrhythmic, especially if ejection fraction is > or =30%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12417544     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000037224.15873.83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  35 in total

1.  Is T-wave alternans as good or better than programmed ventricular stimulation?

Authors:  Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Electrophysiological Testing for the Investigation of Bradycardias.

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Does syncope require rhythmic and non-rhythmic evaluation in patients with previous MI?

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; C Suty-Selton; F Alla; P Y Zinzius; H Blangy; B Azman; A Terrier de la Chaise; P Louis; L Groben; K Djaballah; O Selton; S Magalhaes; L Muresan; J Cedano; A Abdelaal; N Sadoul
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2010-07-29

Review 4.  A Questionable Indication For ICD Extraction After Successful VT Ablation.

Authors:  Luca Segreti; Andrea Di Cori; Giulio Zucchelli; Ezio Soldati; Giovanni Coluccia; Stefano Viani; Luca Paperini; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  Improving sudden cardiac death risk stratification by evaluating electrocardiographic measures of global electrical heterogeneity and clinical outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design for a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

Authors:  Jonathan W Waks; Christopher Hamilton; Saumya Das; Ashkan Ehdaie; Jessica Minnier; Sanjiv Narayan; Mark Niebauer; Merritt Raitt; Christine Tompkins; Niraj Varma; Sumeet Chugh; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Frank A Cuoco; Steven N Singh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Primary ICD-therapy in patients with advanced heart failure: selection strategies and future trials.

Authors:  Lutz Frankenstein; Christian Zugck; Manfred Nelles; Dieter Schellberg; Andrew Remppis; Hugo Katus
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  T-wave alternans for risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Etienne J Pruvot; David S Rosenbaum
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  [Limits and scopes of invasive risk stratification. Do we still need programmed ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  Sascha Rolf; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Programmed electrical stimulation for risk stratification of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Asaf Danon; Jorge E Schliamser; Idit Lavi; Arie Militianu
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2014-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.