OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in the diagnosis of brain death (BD). METHODS: ABRs and SEPs were recorded at the same session in 130 BD patients (age range 8-77 years, 81 male and 49 female). Twenty-four cases were submitted to serial recordings from preterminal conditions through BD. RESULTS: ABRs were absent in 92 cases (70.8%), only waves I or I-II were present in 32 cases (24.6%), while in the remaining 6 patients (4.6%) waves V and/or III were still present, excluding the death of the brain-stem. In 4 cases (3.1%) SEPs showed the absence of all components following the cervical N9, preventing the diagnosis of BD. Among 126 cases (96.9%) with preserved cervical N9-N13 SEPs confirmed the absence of brain-stem activity in 122 cases (93.7%), in whom no waves following P11 or P13 were recordable. SEPs excluded the diagnosis of BD in the remaining 4 cases (3.2%) showing preserved P14 and/or N18. In all pre terminal patients the far-field P14-N18 were present, and their disappearance was closely related to the onset of BD. CONCLUSIONS: The combined us of ABRs and SEPs was able to confirm BD in almost all patients, providing an objective confirmation of the diagnosis, and to exclude it in 7 cases, thus improving the reliability of diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in the diagnosis of brain death (BD). METHODS: ABRs and SEPs were recorded at the same session in 130 BD patients (age range 8-77 years, 81 male and 49 female). Twenty-four cases were submitted to serial recordings from preterminal conditions through BD. RESULTS: ABRs were absent in 92 cases (70.8%), only waves I or I-II were present in 32 cases (24.6%), while in the remaining 6 patients (4.6%) waves V and/or III were still present, excluding the death of the brain-stem. In 4 cases (3.1%) SEPs showed the absence of all components following the cervical N9, preventing the diagnosis of BD. Among 126 cases (96.9%) with preserved cervical N9-N13 SEPs confirmed the absence of brain-stem activity in 122 cases (93.7%), in whom no waves following P11 or P13 were recordable. SEPs excluded the diagnosis of BD in the remaining 4 cases (3.2%) showing preserved P14 and/or N18. In all pre terminal patients the far-field P14-N18 were present, and their disappearance was closely related to the onset of BD. CONCLUSIONS: The combined us of ABRs and SEPs was able to confirm BD in almost all patients, providing an objective confirmation of the diagnosis, and to exclude it in 7 cases, thus improving the reliability of diagnosis.
Authors: Glauco Adrieno Westphal; Valter Duro Garcia; Rafael Lisboa de Souza; Cristiano Augusto Franke; Kalinca Daberkow Vieira; Viviane Renata Zaclikevis Birckholz; Miriam Cristine Machado; Eliana Régia Barbosa de Almeida; Fernando Osni Machado; Luiz Antônio da Costa Sardinha; Raquel Wanzuita; Carlos Eduardo Soares Silvado; Gerson Costa; Vera Braatz; Milton Caldeira Filho; Rodrigo Furtado; Luana Alves Tannous; André Gustavo Neves de Albuquerque; Edson Abdala Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2016-09
Authors: Dylan T Lott; Tenzin Yeshi; N Norchung; Sonam Dolma; Nyima Tsering; Ngawang Jinpa; Tenzin Woser; Kunsang Dorjee; Tenzin Desel; Dan Fitch; Anna J Finley; Robin Goldman; Ana Maria Ortiz Bernal; Rachele Ragazzi; Karthik Aroor; John Koger; Andy Francis; David M Perlman; Joseph Wielgosz; David R W Bachhuber; Tsewang Tamdin; Tsetan Dorji Sadutshang; John D Dunne; Antoine Lutz; Richard J Davidson Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-01-28