OBJECTIVES: Event-related potential (ERP) abnormalities to target stimuli are reliably found in schizophrenia. However, as people with schizophrenia are thought to have difficulty discerning the relevance of incoming sensory stimuli it is also important to examine ERPs to non-targets. To differentiate between potential trait markers of the disease and deficits that might be associated with the consequence of illness chronicity, this study investigated ERPs to both target and non-target stimuli in groups of people with either first episode or chronic schizophrenia (CSz). METHODS: Using an auditory oddball paradigm, ERPs to target, non-target before target (Nt before) and non-target after target (Nt after) stimuli were analysed for 40 patients with CSz, 40 patients with first episode schizophrenia (FESz) and two groups of normal controls matched for age and sex with their patient counterparts. RESULTS: The FESz group showed the same pattern of amplitude disturbance as the CSz group to both targets (reduced N100, N200, P300 and increased P200) and non-targets (reduced N100) compared to controls. Both CSz and FESz groups also failed to show the changes to the P200-N200 component between targets and non-target stimuli that was exhibited by controls (smaller earlier P200 to targets vs. increased delayed P200 to non-targets) or the reduction in N100 amplitude of ERPs to the Nt after stimuli compared with ERPs to the Nt before stimuli. Previous literature has focussed on the sensitivity of P300 deficits in classifying persons into schizophrenia and non-schizophrenia groups. This study demonstrated improved accuracy in the classification of patients with schizophrenia from controls using discriminant analysis of target and non-target N100 and P200 components. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that ERP disturbances are evident at the time of first referral to mental health services and may be a potential trait (rather than secondary effect) of the illness. It is important to include both target and non-target stimuli processing, and their interrelationship in future research.
OBJECTIVES:Event-related potential (ERP) abnormalities to target stimuli are reliably found in schizophrenia. However, as people with schizophrenia are thought to have difficulty discerning the relevance of incoming sensory stimuli it is also important to examine ERPs to non-targets. To differentiate between potential trait markers of the disease and deficits that might be associated with the consequence of illness chronicity, this study investigated ERPs to both target and non-target stimuli in groups of people with either first episode or chronic schizophrenia (CSz). METHODS: Using an auditory oddball paradigm, ERPs to target, non-target before target (Nt before) and non-target after target (Nt after) stimuli were analysed for 40 patients with CSz, 40 patients with first episode schizophrenia (FESz) and two groups of normal controls matched for age and sex with their patient counterparts. RESULTS: The FESz group showed the same pattern of amplitude disturbance as the CSz group to both targets (reduced N100, N200, P300 and increased P200) and non-targets (reduced N100) compared to controls. Both CSz and FESz groups also failed to show the changes to the P200-N200 component between targets and non-target stimuli that was exhibited by controls (smaller earlier P200 to targets vs. increased delayed P200 to non-targets) or the reduction in N100 amplitude of ERPs to the Nt after stimuli compared with ERPs to the Nt before stimuli. Previous literature has focussed on the sensitivity of P300 deficits in classifying persons into schizophrenia and non-schizophrenia groups. This study demonstrated improved accuracy in the classification of patients with schizophrenia from controls using discriminant analysis of target and non-target N100 and P200 components. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that ERP disturbances are evident at the time of first referral to mental health services and may be a potential trait (rather than secondary effect) of the illness. It is important to include both target and non-target stimuli processing, and their interrelationship in future research.
Authors: Holly K Hamilton; Scott W Woods; Brian J Roach; Katiah Llerena; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: John J Foxe; Sherlyn Yeap; Adam C Snyder; Simon P Kelly; Jogin H Thakore; Sophie Molholm Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Bruce I Turetsky; Tiffany A Greenwood; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Dorcas J Dobie; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; James Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Debby W Tsuang; Ming T Tsuang; Monica E Calkins Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Eugene D'Angelo; Larry J Seidman; Sarah Gumlak; April Kim; Kristen A Woodberry; Ashley Rober; Sahil Tembulkar; Kelsey Graber; Kyle O'Donnell; Hesham M Hamoda; Kara Kimball; Alexander Rotenberg; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan; Frank H Duffy Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 4.939