Literature DB >> 12416922

The motivating function of thinking about the future: expectations versus fantasies.

Gabriele Oettingen1, Doris Mayer.   

Abstract

Two forms of thinking about the future are distinguished: expectations versus fantasies. Positive expectations (judging a desired future as likely) predicted high effort and successful performance, but the reverse was true for positive fantasies (experiencing one's thoughts and mental images about a desired future positively). Participants were graduates looking for a job (Study 1), students with a crush on a peer of the opposite sex (Study 2), undergraduates anticipating an exam (Study 3), and patients undergoing hip-replacement surgery (Study 4). Effort and performance were measured weeks or months (up to 2 years) after expectations and fantasies had been assessed. Implications for the self-regulation of effort and performance are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12416922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  32 in total

Review 1.  The functional theory of counterfactual thinking.

Authors:  Kai Epstude; Neal J Roese
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-05

Review 2.  A taxonomy of prospection: introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar; R Nathan Spreng; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The future-oriented repetitive thought (FoRT) scale: A measure of repetitive thinking about the future.

Authors:  Regina Miranda; Alyssa Wheeler; Lillian Polanco-Roman; Brett Marroquín
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  The impact of future expectations on adolescent sexual risk behavior.

Authors:  Heather L Sipsma; Jeannette R Ickovics; Haiqun Lin; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 5.  Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Marie K Krug; Kimberly S Chiew; Wouter Kool; J Andrew Westbrook; Nathan J Clement; R Alison Adcock; Deanna M Barch; Matthew M Botvinick; Charles S Carver; Roshan Cools; Ruud Custers; Anthony Dickinson; Carol S Dweck; Ayelet Fishbach; Peter M Gollwitzer; Thomas M Hess; Derek M Isaacowitz; Mara Mather; Kou Murayama; Luiz Pessoa; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Future expectations among adolescents: a latent class analysis.

Authors:  Heather L Sipsma; Jeannette R Ickovics; Haiqun Lin; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2012-09

Review 7.  Understanding the quality chasm for hypertension control in diabetes: a structured review of "co-maneuvers" used in clinical trials.

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Tim T Issac; Richard L Street; Mark E Kunik
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  Applying Cases to Solve Ethical Problems: The Significance of Positive and Process-Oriented Reflection.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Chase E Thiel; Laura E Martin; Cheryl K Stenmark; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2012

9.  Preparing for what might happen: An episodic specificity induction impacts the generation of alternative future events.

Authors:  Helen G Jing; Kevin P Madore; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-05

10.  The Formation Mechanism of Trust in Patient from Healthcare Professional's Perspective: A Conditional Process Model.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Qing Wu; Yanjiao Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2022-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.