Literature DB >> 12416802

Effects of tail docking on milk quality and cow cleanliness.

D A Schreiner1, P L Ruegg.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of tail docking on somatic cell count (SCC), intramammary infection (IMI), and udder and leg cleanliness in commercial dairy herds. Lactating dairy cows (n = 1250) from eight Wisconsin farms were blocked by farm and randomly allocated to tail docked (D) or control (C) groups. Milk samples, somatic cell counts, and hygiene scores were collected for 8 to 9 mo. The prevalence of IMI was determined for each of the five occasions when milk samples were obtained. Udder and leg cleanliness were assessed during milk sample collection. Docked and control animals were compared by logSCC, prevalence of IMI, and leg and udder cleanliness score. Variables were analyzed according to all treatment, period, and farm interactions. At the end of the study period 76 (12.2%) and 81 (13%) of cows were culled in the D and C groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the initial data for parity, daily milk yield, logSCC, or DIM between treatment groups. Effects significant to farms were identified for all variables over all periods. Period was significant for all variables except for the prevalence of environmental pathogens, but no period x treatment interactions were detected. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for somatic cell count. The prevalence of contagious, environmental, or minor pathogens did not differ significantly between treatment groups. This study did not identify any differences in udder or leg hygiene or milk quality that could be attributed to tail docking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12416802     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74333-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Quarter and cow risk factors associated with a somatic cell count greater than 199,000 cells per milliliter in United Kingdom dairy cows.

Authors:  J E Breen; A J Bradley; M J Green
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Quarter and cow risk factors associated with the occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J E Breen; M J Green; A J Bradley
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Quarter, cow, and farm risk factors for intramammary infections with major pathogens relative to minor pathogens in Thai dairy cows.

Authors:  Kansuda Leelahapongsathon; Ynte Hein Schukken; Witaya Suriyasathaporn
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Farm management factors associated with bulk tank total bacterial count in Irish dairy herds during 2006/07.

Authors:  Pt Kelly; K O'Sullivan; Dp Berry; Sj More; Wj Meaney; Ej O'Callaghan; B O'Brien
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.146

5.  Prevalence of contagious and environmental mastitis-causing bacteria in bulk tank milk and its relationships with milking practices of dairy cattle herds in São Miguel Island (Azores).

Authors:  Carla Azevedo; Diana Pacheco; Luísa Soares; Ricardo Romão; Mónica Moitoso; Jaime Maldonado; Roger Guix; João Simões
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  Indirect quantification of IgG using a digital refractometer, and factors associated with colostrum quality in Norwegian Red Cattle.

Authors:  Julie Føske Johnsen; Johanne Sørby; Cecilie Marie Mejdell; Åse Margrethe Sogstad; Ane Nødtvedt; Ingrid Hunter Holmøy
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Mechanical/thermal sensitivity and superficial temperature in the stump of long-term tail-docked dairy cows.

Authors:  Renata J Troncoso; Daniel E Herzberg; Constanza S Meneses; Heine Y Müller; Marianne P Werner; Hedie Bustamante
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.