Literature DB >> 12416713

Observational methods in epidemiologic assessment of vaccine effectiveness.

Siranda Torvaldsen1, Peter B McIntyre.   

Abstract

Observational methods are important in the measurement of vaccine effectiveness (VE) as experimental designs cannot be used for measurement of vaccines already on the vaccination schedule. Furthermore, efficacy measured in clinical trials under ideal conditions may differ to effectiveness in the field under non-ideal conditions and in different populations. In addition to post-licensure surveillance, observational VE studies are particularly important when disease incidence does not predictably decrease with increased vaccine coverage, when high proportions of vaccine failure among reported cases suggest a problem with the vaccine or when issues arise that were not predicted in pre-licensure evaluations. Commonly used study types for evaluating VE include cohort studies, household contact studies, case-control studies, the screening method and case-cohort studies. There are many potential biases in all observational VE studies which should be considered in the study design and analysis stage. Of the five observational study types reviewed, cohort studies undertaken during an outbreak investigation offer the simplest means of VE estimation and is the preferred study design where the situation permits. Where this is not possible the screening method is the most economical and rapid method. It is essential that the effectiveness of all vaccination programs be evaluated. As new vaccines are introduced to the schedule, booster doses are added and the timing of doses changed, the role of observational methods in the evaluation of VE will become even more important. To date, few observational VE studies have been undertaken in Australia, suggesting the under-utilisation of these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12416713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Dis Intell Q Rep        ISSN: 1447-4514


  10 in total

1.  An assessment of measles vaccine effectiveness, Australia, 2006-2012.

Authors:  Alexis Pillsbury; Helen Quinn
Journal:  Western Pac Surveill Response J       Date:  2015-07-09

2.  Effectiveness and impact of a single-dose vaccine against chickenpox in the community of Madrid between 2001 and 2015.

Authors:  Pello Latasa; Angel Gil de Miguel; Maria Dolores Barranco Ordoñez; Inmaculada Rodero Garduño; Juan Carlos Sanz Moreno; María Ordobás Gavín; María Esteban Vasallo; Macarena Garrido-Estepa; Luis García-Comas
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Acute myocardial infarction and influenza: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Michelle Barnes; Anita E Heywood; Abela Mahimbo; Bayzid Rahman; Anthony T Newall; C Raina Macintyre
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Measles outbreak in complex emergency: estimating vaccine effectiveness and evaluation of the vaccination campaign in Borno State, Nigeria, 2019.

Authors:  Anne Eudes Jean Baptiste; John Wagai; Richard Luce; Balcha Masresha; Don Klinkenberg; Irene Veldhuijzen; Joseph Oteri; Boubacar Dieng; Obianuju Caroline Ikeonu; Sule Meleh; Audu Musa; Fiona Braka; Susan Hahné; E A M Sanders; Eelko Hak
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Invalid measles vaccine dose administration and vaccine effectiveness in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Teklay Desta; Ephrem Lemango; Daddi Wayessa; Liya Wondowossen; Mirkuzie Kerie; Balcha Masresha
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  New theoretical ISM-K2 Bayesian network model for evaluating vaccination effectiveness.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Xie; Bingqi Xie; Dan Xiong; Muzhou Hou; Jinxia Zuo; Guo Wei; Julien Chevallier
Journal:  J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 7.  Methodological challenges in measuring vaccine effectiveness using population cohorts in low resource settings.

Authors:  C King; J Beard; A C Crampin; A Costello; C Mwansambo; N A Cunliffe; R S Heyderman; N French; N Bar-Zeev
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Methods to assess the impact of mass oral cholera vaccination campaigns under real field conditions.

Authors:  Jacqueline Deen; Mohammad Ali; David Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ischaemic heart disease, influenza and influenza vaccination: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  C Raina Macintyre; Anita E Heywood; Pramesh Kovoor; Iman Ridda; Holly Seale; Timothy Tan; Zhanhai Gao; Anthea L Katelaris; Ho Wai Derrick Siu; Vincent Lo; Richard Lindley; Dominic E Dwyer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Laboratory Confirmed Influenza in 2014-2015 Season in Turkey: A Test-Negative Case Control Study.

Authors:  Can Hüseyin Hekimoğlu; Mestan Emek; Emine Avcı; Selmur Topal; Mustafa Demiröz; Gül Ergör
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.021

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.