Literature DB >> 12415925

The history of confounding.

Jan P Vandenbroucke1.   

Abstract

Confounding is a basic problem of comparability--and therefore has always been present in science. Originally a plain English word, it acquired more specific meanings in epidemiologic thinking about experimental and non-experimental research. The use of the word can be traced to Fisher. The concept was developed more fully in social science research, among others by Kish. Landmark developments in epidemiology in the second half of the 20th century were by Cornfield and by Miettinen. These developments emphasised that reasoning about confounding is almost entirely an a priori process that we have to impose upon the data and the data-analysis to arrive at a meaningful interpretation. The problems of confounding present their old challenges again in recent applications to genetic epidemiology.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12415925     DOI: 10.1007/bf01326402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soz Praventivmed        ISSN: 0303-8408


  4 in total

1.  The making of an epidemiological theory of bias and confounding.

Authors:  Alfredo Morabia; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2002

2.  Epidemiologic methods: beyond clinical medicine, beyond epidemiology.

Authors:  Francisco Bolúmar; Miquel Porta
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Multimodal prognostic features of seizure freedom in epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Ali Alim-Marvasti; Vejay Niranjan Vakharia; John Sidney Duncan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 13.654

4.  Control of confounding in the analysis phase - an overview for clinicians.

Authors:  Johnny Kahlert; Sigrid Bjerge Gribsholt; Henrik Gammelager; Olaf M Dekkers; George Luta
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.790

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.