Literature DB >> 12414018

Errors in interpreting quantities as procedures: the case of pharmaceutical labels.

Vimla L Patel1, Timothy Branch, Jose F Arocha.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate and characterize the errors in cognitive processes deployed in the comprehension of procedural texts found on pharmaceutical labels by subjects of different cultural and educational backgrounds. In this study, participants were asked to read and interpret three pharmaceutical labels related to children's medications of varying complexity: oral rehydration therapy (ORT); over-the-counter cough medicine; and over-the-counter fever medicine. Results indicate that: (1) all groups of participants had considerable difficulty in interpreting the instructions; (2), cultural and educational background appeared to be only weakly related to the accuracy of dosage and administration; and (3) errors of comprehension were related to three features of the texts: situation-representational complexity, inherent quantification complexity, and conformity with intuitive models of therapy based on prior knowledge. The results are discussed in terms of the role of multiple representations (boundary objects) and theories of text comprehension to facilitate the reduction of errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12414018     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00045-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  9 in total

Review 1.  Design and comprehensibility of over-the-counter product labels and leaflets: a narrative review.

Authors:  Vivien Tong; David K Raynor; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-07-01

2.  Favorable effects of explanatory illustrations attached to a self-administered questionnaire for upper extremity disorders.

Authors:  Shigeru Kurimoto; Michiro Yamamoto; Takaaki Shinohara; Masahiro Tatebe; Iwatsuki Katsuyuki; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  An empirical study for medication delivery improvement based on healthcare professionals' perceptions of medication delivery system.

Authors:  Lukasz M Mazur; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2009-03

4.  Health IT Usability Focus Section: Adapting EHR-Based Medication Instructions to Comply with Plain Language Guidance-A Randomized Experiment.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Alexander Send; Baria Hafeez; Snezana N Osorio; Erika Abramson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Clinical vocabulary as a boundary object in multidisciplinary care management of multiple chemical sensitivity, a complex and chronic condition.

Authors:  Tara Sampalli; Michael Shepherd; Jack Duffy
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-04-14

6.  The effect of illustrations on patient comprehension of medication instruction labels.

Authors:  Stephen W Hwang; Carolyn Q N Tram; Nadia Knarr
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashfaq Chauhan; Merrilyn Walton; Elizabeth Manias; Ramesh Lahiru Walpola; Holly Seale; Monika Latanik; Desiree Leone; Stephen Mears; Reema Harrison
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-07-08

8.  Information processing by community health nurses using mobile health (mHealth) tools for early identification of suicide and depression risks in Fiji Islands.

Authors:  Vimla Lodhia Patel; Mariel Halpern; Vijayalakshmi Nagaraj; Odille Chang; Sriram Iyengar; William May
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2021-11

9.  Conceptualization, Development and Psychometric Evaluations of a New Medication-Related Health Literacy Instrument: The Chinese Medication Literacy Measurement.

Authors:  Hsiang-Wen Lin; Elizabeth H Chang; Yu Ko; Chun-Yu Wang; Yu-Shan Wang; Okti Ratna Mafruhah; Shang-Hua Wu; Yu-Chieh Chen; Yen-Ming Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.