OBJECTIVE: To compare ICSI with IVF using two insemination concentrations in moderate male infertility and to compare these data with other randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial and meta-analysis. SETTING:University-based tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Seventy-three couples undergoing ART. INTERVENTION(S): In one IVF group a standard insemination concentration of 0.2 x 10(6)/mL was used, whereas in the other group a high insemination concentration (HIC) of 0.8 x 10(6)/mL was used. Each protocol was compared with ICSI on sibling oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, fertilization failure, and embryonic development. RESULT(S): The overall fertilization rate was significantly lower after standard IVF than after ICSI: 37.4% vs. 64.3%. Where HIC IVF was used, the overall fertilization rate was not significantly different from that after ICSI: 59.6% vs. 67.6%. Eight randomized controlled trials were selected and reviewed together with the present randomized controlled trial by meta-analysis. The risk ratio for an oocyte to become fertilized was 1.9 (95% confidence interval of 1.4 to 2.5) in favor of ICSI, and 3.1 ICSI cycles may be needed to avoid one complete fertilization failure after conventional IVF (95% CI of 1.7 to 12.4). CONCLUSION(S): The data from this study and the meta-analysis show that ICSI is a more efficient technique in terms of fertilization, but not in comparison with HIC IVF.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare ICSI with IVF using two insemination concentrations in moderate male infertility and to compare these data with other randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial and meta-analysis. SETTING: University-based tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Seventy-three couples undergoing ART. INTERVENTION(S): In one IVF group a standard insemination concentration of 0.2 x 10(6)/mL was used, whereas in the other group a high insemination concentration (HIC) of 0.8 x 10(6)/mL was used. Each protocol was compared with ICSI on sibling oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, fertilization failure, and embryonic development. RESULT(S): The overall fertilization rate was significantly lower after standard IVF than after ICSI: 37.4% vs. 64.3%. Where HIC IVF was used, the overall fertilization rate was not significantly different from that after ICSI: 59.6% vs. 67.6%. Eight randomized controlled trials were selected and reviewed together with the present randomized controlled trial by meta-analysis. The risk ratio for an oocyte to become fertilized was 1.9 (95% confidence interval of 1.4 to 2.5) in favor of ICSI, and 3.1 ICSI cycles may be needed to avoid one complete fertilization failure after conventional IVF (95% CI of 1.7 to 12.4). CONCLUSION(S): The data from this study and the meta-analysis show that ICSI is a more efficient technique in terms of fertilization, but not in comparison with HIC IVF.
Authors: V Barraud-Lange; C Sifer; K Pocaté; A Ziyyat; B Martin-Pont; R Porcher; J N Hugues; J P Wolf Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 3.412