Literature DB >> 12413323

Abdominal compartment syndrome in the open abdomen.

Vicente H Gracias1, Benjamin Braslow, Jon Johnson, John Pryor, Rajan Gupta, Patrick Reilly, C William Schwab.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple methods exist to manage in the intensive care unit the patient with an open abdomen. An increasingly common method is the vacuum packed technique. This method accommodates considerable expansion of intra-abdominal contents and should obviate the potential development of the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Despite this, some patients with these temporary abdominal dressings will go on to develop ACS. For the purpose of this study we have defined this clinical entity as the open abdomen ACS. HYPOTHESIS: Patients with an open abdomen who develop ACS have a poor prognosis. Fluid requirements and resuscitative indices may predict which of these patients will develop open abdomen ACS.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with trauma who had an open abdomen treated with vacuum packed dressings at our urban level I trauma center. Over 1 year (July 1, 1999-June 30, 2000), 5 patients managed with an open abdomen developed ACS. These patients were compared with 15 consecutive patients with an open abdomen who did not develop clinical ACS during that same period. Fluid resuscitation, base deficit, pH, lactate level, systolic blood pressure, prothrombin time, temperature, peak inspiratory pressure, and PCO(2) were abstracted. The Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: In patients managed with an open abdomen, ACS developed between 1.5 and 12 hours (mean [SD], 7.5 [3.9] hours) after placement of the vacuum packed dressing. The base deficit, pH, peak inspiratory pressure, PCO(2,) and lactate level were more abnormal and the crystalloid requirements were significantly higher in the ACS group. The systolic blood pressure, temperature, and prothrombin time did not differ between groups. Three patients with ACS developed a second episode of ACS. Mortality in the ACS group was 3 (60%) of 5 patients vs 1 (7%) of 15 patients in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of the open abdomen with the temporary abdominal closure does not prevent the development of ACS. Mortality is high when ACS occurs in this scenario. Severe physiologic derangement and high crystalloid requirements may predict which patients will develop ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413323     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.11.1298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  22 in total

Review 1.  [New approaches to intensive care for sepsis].

Authors:  G Marx; T Schuerholz; K Reinhart
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome: significance, diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  A Schachtrupp; M Jansen; P Bertram; R Kuhlen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome: are we winning the battle?

Authors:  Zsolt J Balogh; Karlijn van Wessem; Osamu Yoshino; Frederick A Moore
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Philip A Efron; Trina M Bala; Martin D Rosenthal; Chasen A Croft; Michael S Walters; R Stephen Smith; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Lessons from Trauma Care: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Damage Control Laparotomy in the Patient with Gastrointestinal Disease.

Authors:  Aaron Richman; Clay Cothren Burlew
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Vacuum-assisted wound care (V.A.C.®) for enteric fistula closure: how we do it.

Authors:  Daniele Gui; Gilda Pepe; Cosimo Callari; Roberto Persiani; Andrea Di Giorgio; Sabina Magalini
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations.

Authors:  Michael L Cheatham; Manu L N G Malbrain; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Michael Sugrue; Michael Parr; Jan De Waele; Zsolt Balogh; Ari Leppäniemi; Claudia Olvera; Rao Ivatury; Scott D'Amours; Julia Wendon; Ken Hillman; Alexander Wilmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Michael L Cheatham; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Michael Sugrue; Michael Parr; Jan De Waele; Zsolt Balogh; Ari Leppäniemi; Claudia Olvera; Rao Ivatury; Scott D'Amours; Julia Wendon; Ken Hillman; Kenth Johansson; Karel Kolkman; Alexander Wilmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Abdominal compartment syndrome: current problems and new strategies.

Authors:  Cem Kaan Parsak; Gulsah Seydaoglu; Gurhan Sakman; T Oguz Acarturk; Emre Karakoc; Ismail Hanta; Ali Haydar Alparslan; Salim Satar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Anastomotic leak management after a low anterior resection leading to recurrent abdominal compartment syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kostas Toutouzas; Eleftheria S Kleidi; Panagiotis G Drimousis; Margarita Balla; Metaxia N Papanikolaou; Andreas Larentzakis; Dimitrios Theodorou; Stylianos Katsaragakis
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.