Literature DB >> 12413321

In situ vs ex situ pancreatic duct stents of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy with billroth I-type reconstruction.

Susumu Ohwada1, Yoshifumi Tanahashi, Tetsushi Ogawa, Susumu Kawate, Kunihiro Hamada, Ken-Ich Tago, Tatsuya Yamada, Yasuo Morishita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and an external stent of pancreaticojejunostomy has been recommended to prevent pancreatic fistula. HYPOTHESIS: Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy should not require placement of an external stent.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized control study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were allocated to either the ex situ group (external pancreatic stent drainage) or the in situ group (no external drainage). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative mortality; postoperative complications, particularly pancreatic fistula; and patency of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy.
RESULTS: Preoperative factors, indicated disorders, and intraoperative factors were similar for both groups. Mortality rates were 1% (1/74) overall, 3% (1 death) for the in situ group, and 0% for the ex situ group. Morbidity rates were 32% (12/37) for the in situ group and 35% (13/37) for the ex situ group. The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 5.4% and was the same for the in situ and ex situ groups. The incidence of delayed gastric emptying was similar for the in situ (19% [7/37]) and ex situ (14% [5/37]) groups. Ampullary tumors and pancreatic ducts 2 mm or less in diameter had a higher incidence of pancreatic fistula, but the incidence was similar in both treatment groups. Nasogastric tube drainage day, the median hospital stay, and pancreaticojejunostomy patency were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results were considered to show equivalent outcomes for ex situ and in situ pancreatic stenting of the duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The use of transanastomotic stents has to be selective according to the individual characteristics of each patient. We recommend their use with ampullary tumors or small ducts (< or =2 mm).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413321     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.11.1289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  26 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Miroslav Ryska; Jan Rudis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The evaluation of duct-to-mucosal pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hironobu Onishi; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Manabu Kawai; Masaki Ueno; Takashi Hama; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hiroshi Terasawa; Manabu Kawai; Shinomi Ina; Seiko Hirono; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Indications and results of pancreatic stump duct occlusion after duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Giuseppe Quero; Fausto Rosa; Dario Di Miceli; Antonio Pio Tortorelli; Giovanni Battista Doglietto
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-08

Review 6.  External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shukun Hong; Hongye Wang; Shiyong Yang; Kunxing Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Successful management of recurrent biliary colic caused by pancreatic stent migration after Whipple procedure.

Authors:  Muhammad Z Bawany; Ehsan Rafiq; Raja Thotakura; Michael D McPhee; Ali Nawras
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-01

8.  External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ronnie T P Poon; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Kelvin K Ng; Wai Key Yuen; Chun Yeung; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer: interrupted vs continuous stitches.

Authors:  Seung-Eun Lee; Sung-Hoon Yang; Jin-Young Jang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture.

Authors:  Kenichi Hakamada; Shunji Narumi; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Masaki Nara; Kenosuke Ishido; Takuya Miura; Norihito Kubo; Mutsuo Sasaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.