Literature DB >> 12413217

Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer.

Valeria V Gordan1, Ivar A Mjör.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the post-operative sensitivity of posterior restorations restored with a resin-based restorative material and a self-etching primer. Forty-six restorations, 28 Class I and 18 Class II were placed by two clinicians in 25 patients. After cavity preparations were completed under rubber dam isolation, they were restored using a self-etching primer (Fluorobond, Shofu Inc, Kyoto, Japan) and a resin-based restorative material (Beautifil, Shofu Inc, Kyoto, Japan). Patients were contacted on days 2 and 7 post-operatively and questioned regarding the presence of sensitivity, the stimuli that created sensitivity, the length of time the sensitivity lasted and its intensity using a rating scale from slight to severe. If sensitivity was experienced on day 7, patients were also contacted on days 14, 30 and 90 to assess the degree of sensitivity. All patients were recalled after 6-, 12- and 24-months for further evaluation of any sensitivity experienced. Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact Test were used for statistical analysis. At day 2, six restorations were sensitive to cold with no statistical difference (p > 0.05) from the restorations that were not sensitive. At day 7, only two restorations were sensitive. No sensitivity was present after day 14, which was also confirmed at the six-month recall. No correlation could be established among the duration of the sensitivity, the degree of pain and the causes that initiated sensitivity (p > 0.05). At one-year recall, one restoration was replaced due to post-operative sensitivity that started after the six-month recall. No sensitivity was noted at the 24-month recall. No correlation (p > 0.05) was found between sensitive restorations and those with a normal response throughout the study. The study showed that Fluorobond self-etching primer and Beautifil resin-based restorative material, when placed in posterior restorations, do not result in long-term post-operative sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  10 in total

1.  Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.

Authors:  Juergen Manhart; Hong-Yan Chen; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite with conventional flowable composite in Class I cavity: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Ashwini V Kalola; S U Sreejith; Shikha Kanodia; Abhishek Parmar; Jaiprathiksha V Iyer; Girish J Parmar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) Network. Part 1.

Authors:  Gary Berkowitz; Howard Spielman; Abigail Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald Craig; Frederick Curro; Van Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-03

4.  Analysis of interfacial structure and bond strength of self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Lilliam M Pinzon; Larry G Watanabe; Andre F Reis; John M Powers; Sally J Marshall; Grayson W Marshall
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  The effect of temperature change on fluoride uptake from a mouthrinse by enamel specimens.

Authors:  Serdar Baglar; Adil Nalcaci; Mustafa Tastekin
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-10

6.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

7.  Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Kn Jyothi; S Annapurna; Anil S Kumar; P Venugopal; Cm Jayashankara
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

8.  The effect of bonding and surface sealant application on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites.

Authors:  Neslihan Tekce; Mustafa Demirci; Sultan Aslıhan Gokturk; Safa Tuncer; Emre Ozel; Kansad Pala; Canan Baydemir
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-10-21

9.  Effect of a Self-Etch Adhesive Containing Nanobioglass on Postoperative Sensitivity of Posterior Composite Restorations - A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Zakaria Aboelenein; Mona Ismail Riad; Mohammed Fouad Haridy
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-25

10.  Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations.

Authors:  Hande Sar Sancakli; Esra Yildiz; Isil Bayrak; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.