Literature DB >> 12412945

Measuring and improving preventive care for patients with diabetes in primary health centers.

Todd S Harwell1, Janet M McDowall, Dorothy Gohdes, Steven D Helgerson.   

Abstract

Diabetes care among medically underserved patients is suboptimal. Few studies, however, have described successful strategies to improve diabetes care in these patient populations. To address this issue, 4 Montana community health centers and 1 urban Indian health center implemented quality improvement efforts along with an office-based electronic system for monitoring diabetes care. After a median of 17 months follow-up, preventive services and clinical outcomes were assessed for all patients at baseline (N = 332) and follow-up (N = 590), and for a cohort (N = 164) who had 1 or more visits 6 months after baseline. In cross-sectional analyses, there were increases from baseline to follow-up in the percent of patients who had received an annual foot examination (50% to 68%), microalbuminuria testing (34% to 62%), annual retinal examination (14% to 30%), pneumococcal immunization (30% to 61%), and smoking assessment (77% to 91%). But neither HbA1c testing in the previous 6 months (64% to 55%) nor annual LDL-C testing (59% to 61%) showed any improvement. There were no significant changes from baseline to follow-up in the median hemoglobin A1c (HbAlc), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LOL-C), or in systolic and diastolic blood pressure values. Similar improvements in preventive care were seen in the cohort of patients with diabetes. But overall outcomes were not improved. Our findings suggest that office-based monitoring systems can support systems' changes to improve the delivery of preventive services to patients with diabetes in primary care facilities for the underserved, but outcomes are more difficult to enhance over a short period of follow-up. Also, our findings suggest that over a relatively short-term period, cross-sectional and cohort analyses of quality improvement measures do yield similar measures of diabetes care in such settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12412945     DOI: 10.1177/106286060201700504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  5 in total

1.  Point of care testing to improve glycemic control.

Authors:  George Rust; Morna Gailor; Elvan Daniels; Barbara McMillan-Persaud; Harry Strothers; Robert Mayberry
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2008

2.  A field-based approach to support improved diabetes care in rural states.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Johnson; Wanda L Webb; Janet M McDowall; Linda L Chasson; Carrie S Oser; Joseph R Grandpre; Madhavi I Marasinghe; Marcene K Butcher; Erin M O'Leary; Todd S Harwell; Dorothy Gohdes; Steven D Helgerson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Importance of an alternative approach to measuring quality in a volume-to-value world: a case study of diabetes care.

Authors:  Letoynia Jenee Coombs; Betty Burston; Darren Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2017-12-10

4.  Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Joe Kai
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Exploring the feasibility of combining chronic disease patient registry data to monitor the status of diabetes care.

Authors:  Angela M Kemple; Noelle Hartwick; Marilyn H Sitaker; Jeanne J Harmon; Kathleen Clark; Jan Norman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.