Literature DB >> 12412888

Visual binding in the standing wave illusion.

James T Enns1.   

Abstract

When two video frames are alternated at the appropriate rate, one with a central bar and the other with two flanking bars, the central bar becomes invisible. Competing explanations for this standing wave illusion are examined, with the results showing an influence of higher level shape representations on lower level edge processes. In Experiment 1, flanking bar duration was found to be more important to masking than central bar duration. Experiment 2 showed strong nonlocal effects in that masking of the central bar depended critically on whether it appeared in the same video frame as other visible bars. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that the contour shared by bars in separate frames was a less important factor than shape and surface similarity. This illusion is therefore an excellent tool for studying recursive interactions between higher level object representations and lower level contour processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12412888     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Seeing properties of an invisible object: feature inheritance and shine-through.

Authors:  M H Herzog; C Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking.

Authors:  S L Macknik; S Martinez-Conde; M M Haglund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.

Authors:  V Di Lollo; J T Enns; R A Rensink
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-12

4.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system.

Authors:  S L Macknik; M S Livingstone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Shine-through: temporal aspects.

Authors:  M H Herzog; C Koch; M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  What's new in visual masking?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons.

Authors:  J M Hupé; A C James; B R Payne; S G Lomber; P Girard; J Bullier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Optical images of visible and invisible percepts in the primary visual cortex of primates.

Authors:  S L Macknik; M M Haglund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Transposition in backward masking. The case of the travelling gap.

Authors:  A E Wilson; R M Johnson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Lateral masking in cycling displays: the relative importance of separation, flanker duration, and interstimulus interval for object-mediated updating.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Visibility, visual awareness, and visual masking of simple unattended targets are confined to areas in the occipital cortex beyond human V1/V2.

Authors:  Peter U Tse; Susana Martinez-Conde; Alexander A Schlegel; Stephen L Macknik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Geometry of Visual Perception: Retinotopic and Non-retinotopic Representations in the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 10.961

4.  The role of feedback in visual masking and visual processing.

Authors:  Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

5.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

6.  Temporal processes in prime-mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

7.  The mechanisms of feature inheritance as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention and decision making.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

8.  Postdictive modulation of visual orientation.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Invisibility and interpretation.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Frouke Hermens; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-17

10.  Apparent motion can impair and enhance target visibility: the role of shape in predicting and postdicting object continuity.

Authors:  Peter J Lenkic; James T Enns
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.