Literature DB >> 12412887

Self-control by pigeons in the prisoner's dilemma.

Forest Baker1, Howard Rachlin.   

Abstract

Pigeons played a repeated prisoner's dilemma game against a computer that reflected theirchoices: If a pigeon cooperated on trial n, the computer cooperated on trial n + 1; if the pigeon defected on trial n, the computer defected on trial n + 1. Cooperation thus maximized reinforcement in the long term, but defection was worth more on the current trial. Under these circumstances, pigeons normally defect. However, when a signal correlated with the pigeon's previous choice immediately followed each current trial choice, some pigeons learned to cooperate. Furthermore, cooperation was higher when trials were close together in time than when they were separated by long intertrial intervals.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12412887     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate.

Authors:  G M Heyman; L Tanz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of autoshaping in cooperative two-player games between starlings.

Authors:  J C Reboreda; A Kacelnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Prisoner's dilemma and the pigeon: Control by immediate consequences.

Authors:  L Green; P C Price; M E Hamburger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Soft commitment: self-control achieved by response persistence.

Authors:  E Siegel; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Learning by pigeons playing against tit-for-tat in an operant prisoner's dilemma.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Forest Baker; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The Temporal Dynamics of Cooperation.

Authors:  Matthew L Locey; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2011-01-24

3.  Accepting loss: the temporal limits of reciprocity in brown capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  A Ramseyer; M Pelé; V Dufour; C Chauvin; B Thierry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Impulsiveness does not prevent cooperation from emerging but reduces its occurrence: an experiment with zebra finches.

Authors:  Camille Chia; Frédérique Dubois
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cognitive and motivational requirements for the emergence of cooperation in a rat social game.

Authors:  Duarte S Viana; Isabel Gordo; Elio Sucena; Marta A P Moita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.