| Literature DB >> 12412133 |
Ryo Ohashi1, José Manuel Otero, Adam Chwistek, Jean-François P Hamel.
Abstract
This study compares microfluidic technology (Protein 200 LabChip Assay kit, Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, referred to here as Protein 200) to the traditional approach for protein analysis, one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), for the sizing and quantification of immunoglobulin G (IgG) in hybridoma cell cultures. Internal references differ between each method: purified IgG was used alone in SDS-PAGE while myosin (the upper marker) was added to each sample in Protein 200. The IgG used here were produced in cultures propagated in either a serum-free or a serum-containing medium. With serum-containing samples, there was a significant difference in the IgG concentrations (p < 0.05) between SDS-PAGE and Protein 200. The concentration determined by SDS-PAGE was significantly higher (> 30%) than by Protein 200 or by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) because the large amounts of serum albumin in the samples affect the accuracy of SDS-PAGE. Protein 200 can determine size similarly to SDS-PAGE in serum-free samples (standard error of the mean, SEM, < 1%, 95% confidence < +/-1%), unlike in serum-containing samples. The Protein 200 assay was more effective than the traditional one-dimensional SDS-PAGE in determining concentration and size of IgG in cell culture samples and it provided a miniaturized and convenient platform for rapid analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12412133 DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200210)23:20<3623::AID-ELPS3623>3.0.CO;2-T
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Electrophoresis ISSN: 0173-0835 Impact factor: 3.535