Literature DB >> 12412017

Tooth development is independent of a Hox patterning programme.

Chela T James1, Atsushi Ohazama, Abigail S Tucker, Paul T Sharpe.   

Abstract

Hox genes have a critical role in controlling the patterning processes of many tissues by imparting positional information in embryogenesis. Patterning of the pharyngeal component of the skull (the visceroskeleton) has been proposed to be influenced by this "Hox code." Recently, it has been shown that Hox genes are associated with the evolution of jaws, loss of Hox gene expression in the first branchial arch being necessary for the transition from the agnathan condition to the gnathostome condition. Teeth develop on the first branchial arch in mammals and, therefore, might be expected to be under the control of Hox genes in a manner similar to that of the cranial skeletal elements. However, we show that, unlike cartilage and bone, the development of teeth is not affected by alterations in Hoxa2 expression. Tooth development in the first arch was unaffected by overexpression of Hoxa2, whereas recombinations of second arch mesenchyme with first arch epithelium led to tooth development within a Hoxa2-positive environment. These data demonstrate that teeth develop from local interactions and that tooth formation is not under the axial patterning program specified by the Hox genes. We propose that the evolutionary development of teeth in the first branchial arch is independent of the loss of Hox expression necessary for the development of the jaw. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12412017     DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.10168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary and developmental origins of the vertebrate dentition.

Authors:  Ann Huysseune; Jean-Yves Sire; P Eckhard Witten
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Genome-wide association study reveals multiple loci associated with primary tooth development during infancy.

Authors:  Demetris Pillas; Clive J Hoggart; David M Evans; Paul F O'Reilly; Kirsi Sipilä; Raija Lähdesmäki; Iona Y Millwood; Marika Kaakinen; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; David Blane; Pimphen Charoen; Ulla Sovio; Anneli Pouta; Nelson Freimer; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Jaana Laitinen; Sarianna Vaara; Beate Glaser; Peter Crawford; Nicholas J Timpson; Susan M Ring; Guohong Deng; Weihua Zhang; Mark I McCarthy; Panos Deloukas; Leena Peltonen; Paul Elliott; Lachlan J M Coin; George Davey Smith; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Quantitative Genetics, Pleiotropy, and Morphological Integration in the Dentition of Papio hamadryas.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.119

4.  An ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws.

Authors:  Gareth J Fraser; C Darrin Hulsey; Ryan F Bloomquist; Kristine Uyesugi; Nancy R Manley; J Todd Streelman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Molars and incisors: show your microarray IDs.

Authors:  Virginie Laugel-Haushalter; Marie Paschaki; Christelle Thibault-Carpentier; Doulaye Dembelé; Pascal Dollé; Agnès Bloch-Zupan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-26

6.  Making Space for Permanent Molars in Growing Baboon (Papio anubis) and Great Ape (Pan paniscus and P. troglodytes) Mandibles: Possible Ontogenetic Strategies and Solutions.

Authors:  Julia C Boughner
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2011-06-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.