Literature DB >> 12410900

Description of the National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study.

Susan D Horn1, Stacy A Bender, Nancy Bergstrom, Abby S Cook, Maree L Ferguson, Holly L Rimmasch, Siobhan S Sharkey, Randall J Smout, George A Taler, Anne C Voss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe and provide baseline data from The National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study (NPULS).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of detailed resident characteristics, treatments, and outcomes using convenience sampling.
SETTING: One hundred nine long-term care facilities throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred twenty adult residents aged 18 and older, with a length of stay of 14 days or longer and who were at risk of developing a pressure ulcer, as defined by a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk MEASUREMENTS: More than 500 characteristics were obtained for each resident over a 12-week period. This paper describes the NPULS database with respect to the resident (sex, age, diagnoses, severity of illness scores, Braden Scale score, activities of daily living, cognitive ability, mobility, bowel or bladder incontinence, laboratory values, nutritional assessment, and pressure ulcer assessment documentation), treatment (nutritional interventions, pressure relieving devices, incontinence interventions, protective devices, turning schedules, and pressure ulcer treatments), and outcome variables (pressure ulcer development and healing, pressure ulcer and systemic infection, changes in nutritional status, and discharge disposition) associated with pressure ulcers. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were used for preliminary analyses of resident, treatment, and outcome characteristics.
RESULTS: The average age +/- standard deviation was 79.7 +/- 14.2; 70% of the residents were female. Fifty-three percent of residents (n = 1,293) were at risk of developing a pressure ulcer but never developed one during the study (Group 1), 19% developed a new pressure ulcer during the study (n = 457) (Group 2), 22% had an existing pressure ulcer (n = 534) (Group 3), and 6% had an existing pressure ulcer and developed a new ulcer during the study (n = 136) (Group 4). Residents who developed a new pressure ulcer (Group 2) were more likely to be female, older, cognitively impaired, and immobile than residents who had an existing pressure ulcer (Group 3).
CONCLUSIONS: This baseline study describes the NPULS database with respect to the resident, treatment, and outcome variables associated with pressure ulcers. Future studies will focus on multivariate analyses for risk factor prediction of pressure ulcer development and pressure ulcer healing. Research-based pressure ulcer prevention and treatment protocols can then be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12410900     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  12 in total

1.  Nurses' use of water-filled gloves in preventing heel pressure ulcer in the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  Prisca Olabisi Adejumo; Justin Agorye Ingwu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Racial and ethnic disparities in the healing of pressure ulcers present at nursing home admission.

Authors:  Donna Z Bliss; Olga Gurvich; Kay Savik; Lynn E Eberly; Susan Harms; Christine Mueller; Judith Garrard; Kristen Cunanan; Kjerstie Wiltzen
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 3.  Nutrition and Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Joseph Andrew Molnar; Mary Jane Underdown; William Andrew Clark
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Implementation of best practice in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in the acute orthopedic population.

Authors:  Karen E Campbell; M Gail Woodbury; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Assessment and treatment of pain in people with dementia.

Authors:  Anne Corbett; Bettina Husebo; Marzia Malcangio; Amelia Staniland; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Dag Aarsland; Clive Ballard
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  First evidence on the validity and reliability of the Safety Organizing Scale-Nursing Home version (SOS-NH).

Authors:  Dietmar Ausserhofer; Ruth A Anderson; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; René Schwendimann
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  Rate of Pressure Ulcers in Intensive Units and General Wards of Iranian Hospitals and Methods for Their Detection.

Authors:  Ali Akbari Sari; Leila Doshmanghir; Zahra Neghahban; Maryam Ghiasipour; Zeinab Beheshtizavareh
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 8.  Pain in Neurodegenerative Disease: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Marina de Tommaso; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Ruth Defrin; Miriam Kunz; Gisele Pickering; Massimiliano Valeriani
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Assessing nursing staff's competences in mobility support in nursing-home care: development and psychometric testing of the Kinaesthetics Competence (KC) observation instrument.

Authors:  Heidrun Gattinger; Helena Leino-Kilpi; Virpi Hantikainen; Sascha Köpke; Stefan Ott; Beate Senn
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-11-22

10.  Operative debridement of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Jessica Schiffman; Michael S Golinko; Alan Yan; Anna Flattau; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Harold Brem
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.