Stephen R Lord1, Julia Dayhew, Amelia Howland. 1. Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, University of New South Wales, Australia. S.Lord@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which multifocal glasses impair contrast sensitivity and depth perception at critical distances required for detecting hazards in the environment and whether multifocal glasses use increases the risk of falls in older people. DESIGN: One-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Falls Laboratory, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six community-dwelling people aged 63-90. MEASUREMENTS: Contrast sensitivity, depth perception, accidental falls. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects (55.8%) were regular wearers of multifocal (bifocal, trifocal, or progressive lens) glasses. These subjects performed significantly worse in the distant depth perception and distant edge-contrast sensitivity tests in conditions that forced them to view test stimuli through the lower segments of their glasses. Multifocal glasses wearers were more than twice as likely to fall in the follow-up period than nonmultifocal glasses wearers (odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-4.92), when adjusting for age, poor vision, reduced lower limb sensation and strength, slow reaction time, and increased postural sway. Multifocal glasses wearers were also more likely to fall because of a trip (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.08-7.22), when outside their homes (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.14-5.70), and when walking up or down stairs (P <.01). The population attributable risks of regular multifocal glasses use were 35.2% for any falls, 40.9% for falls due to a trip, and 40.9% for falls outside the home. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that multifocal glasses impair depth perception and edge-contrast sensitivity at critical distances for detecting obstacles in the environment. Older people may benefit from wearing nonmultifocal glasses when negotiating stairs and in unfamiliar settings outside the home.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which multifocal glasses impair contrast sensitivity and depth perception at critical distances required for detecting hazards in the environment and whether multifocal glasses use increases the risk of falls in older people. DESIGN: One-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Falls Laboratory, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six community-dwelling people aged 63-90. MEASUREMENTS: Contrast sensitivity, depth perception, accidental falls. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects (55.8%) were regular wearers of multifocal (bifocal, trifocal, or progressive lens) glasses. These subjects performed significantly worse in the distant depth perception and distant edge-contrast sensitivity tests in conditions that forced them to view test stimuli through the lower segments of their glasses. Multifocal glasses wearers were more than twice as likely to fall in the follow-up period than nonmultifocal glasses wearers (odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-4.92), when adjusting for age, poor vision, reduced lower limb sensation and strength, slow reaction time, and increased postural sway. Multifocal glasses wearers were also more likely to fall because of a trip (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.08-7.22), when outside their homes (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.14-5.70), and when walking up or down stairs (P <.01). The population attributable risks of regular multifocal glasses use were 35.2% for any falls, 40.9% for falls due to a trip, and 40.9% for falls outside the home. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that multifocal glasses impair depth perception and edge-contrast sensitivity at critical distances for detecting obstacles in the environment. Older people may benefit from wearing nonmultifocal glasses when negotiating stairs and in unfamiliar settings outside the home.
Authors: Susan V Bukata; Benedict F Digiovanni; Susan M Friedman; Harry Hoyen; Amy Kates; Stephen L Kates; Simon C Mears; Daniel A Mendelson; Fernando H Serna; Frederick E Sieber; Wakenda K Tyler Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2011-01
Authors: Mark J Haran; Ian D Cameron; Rebecca Q Ivers; Judy M Simpson; Bonsan B Lee; Michael Tanzer; Mamta Porwal; Marcella M S Kwan; Connie Severino; Stephen R Lord Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-05-25
Authors: Julie Bruce; Anower Hossain; Ranjit Lall; Emma J Withers; Susanne Finnegan; Martin Underwood; Chen Ji; Chris Bojke; Roberta Longo; Claire Hulme; Susie Hennings; Ray Sheridan; Katharine Westacott; Shvaita Ralhan; Finbarr Martin; John Davison; Fiona Shaw; Dawn A Skelton; Jonathan Treml; Keith Willett; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Timothy Chi Yui Kwok; Yi Su; Chyi Chyi Khoo; Jason Leung; Anthony Kwok; Eric Orwoll; Jean Woo; Ping Chung Leung Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 2.626