Literature DB >> 12410038

An immunohistochemical analysis and comparison of posterior polymorphous dystrophy with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy.

Glenn C Cockerham1, Nora V Laver, Ahmed A Hidayat, Deborah L McCoy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the immunohistochemical profiles of the abnormal endothelial cells of posterior polymorphous dystrophy (PPMD) and congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED).
METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of seven corneas with the diagnosis of PPMD (seven patients), six corneas with the diagnosis of CHED (four patients), and five control corneas were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Adjacent histologic sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies that react with pancytokeratin, AE1/AE3, cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK 20, CAM 5.2, and epithelial membrane antigen. The immunoreactivity of the corneal endothelium was assessed by light microscopy.
RESULTS: The endothelial cells stained positive for pancytokeratin and CK 7 in seven of seven corneas of patients with PPMD and five of six corneas of patients with CHED; variable positivity was seen to AE1, AE3, and CAM 5.2. The endothelium was uniformly negative to staining by CK 20. The epithelium stained positive with pancytokeratin, AE1, and AE3. All control corneas were negative for pancytokeratin, CK 7, and CK 20.
CONCLUSION: The abnormal endothelium in both PPMD and CHED expresses similar CKs, including CK 7, which is not present in normal endothelium or surface epithelium. This may indicate a shared developmental abnormality in these conditions, as previously suggested by ultrastructural studies and genetic mapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12410038     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200211000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

Review 1.  Molecular bases of corneal endothelial dystrophies.

Authors:  Thore Schmedt; Mariana Mazzini Silva; Alireza Ziaei; Ula Jurkunas
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  MUC16 as a sensitive and specific marker for epithelial downgrowth.

Authors:  Vicky C Pai; Ben J Glasgow
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11

3.  The PPCD1 mouse: characterization of a mouse model for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and identification of a candidate gene.

Authors:  Anna L Shen; Kathleen A O'Leary; Richard R Dubielzig; Norman Drinkwater; Christopher J Murphy; Charles B Kasper; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Characteristics of corneal dystrophies: a review from clinical, histological and genetic perspectives.

Authors:  Ze-Nan Lin; Jie Chen; Hong-Ping Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 5.  Toward unraveling the complexity of simple epithelial keratins in human disease.

Authors:  M Bishr Omary; Nam-On Ku; Pavel Strnad; Shinichiro Hanada
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Attempting to distinguish between endogenous and contaminating cytokeratins in a corneal proteomic study.

Authors:  Mikkel Lyngholm; Henrik Vorum; Kim Nielsen; Niels Ehlers; Bent Honoré
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  Progenitors for the corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork: a potential source for personalized stem cell therapy in corneal endothelial diseases and glaucoma.

Authors:  Wing Yan Yu; Carl Sheridan; Ian Grierson; Sharon Mason; Victoria Kearns; Amy Cheuk Yin Lo; David Wong
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 8.  Corneal dystrophies.

Authors:  Gordon K Klintworth
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Association of a Chromosomal Rearrangement Event with Mouse Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy and Alterations in Csrp2bp, Dzank1, and Ovol2 Gene Expression.

Authors:  Anna L Shen; Susan A Moran; Edward A Glover; Norman R Drinkwater; Rebecca E Swearingen; Leandro B Teixeira; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.