PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of several techniques for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Retrospective review of 10 eyes from nine patients undergoing phacoemulsification after LASIK. Corneal power (K) was measured by manual keratometry (MK), refractive history (RH), contact lens overrefraction (CTL), videokeratography (VK), and an average of the refractive history and contact lens methods (AVG 2). Results were compared with the back-calculated K value generated by the Holladay IOL Consultant program. Age-matched patients undergoing phacoemulsification without previous refractive surgery served as controls. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent postoperative refraction was +0.21 diopter (D) (SD, 1.54; range, -2.25 to +2.25 D) for patients undergoing cataract extraction after LASIK versus -0.56 D (SD, 0.66; range, -2.375 to +0.5 D; p= 0.16) for controls. Thirty percent of cases versus 90% of controls were within 1 D ( p= 0.002) of emmetropia. Forty percent of cases versus no controls were more than 1 D hyperopic ( p= 0.08). The mean differences for each method compared with the back-calculated K values were MK, +0.82 D; VK, +1.24 D; RH, -0.76 D; CTL, +0.91 D; AVG 2, +0.08 D. The mean absolute deviations from the back-calculated K values were MK, 1.91 D; VK, 2.01 D; RH, 1.68 D; CTL, 1.62 D; AVG 2, 1.42 D. CONCLUSION: Significant refractive errors occurred with each of the methods investigated for determining IOL power after LASIK. RH, CL, or AVG 2 provided the most accurate results.
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of several techniques for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Retrospective review of 10 eyes from nine patients undergoing phacoemulsification after LASIK. Corneal power (K) was measured by manual keratometry (MK), refractive history (RH), contact lens overrefraction (CTL), videokeratography (VK), and an average of the refractive history and contact lens methods (AVG 2). Results were compared with the back-calculated K value generated by the Holladay IOL Consultant program. Age-matched patients undergoing phacoemulsification without previous refractive surgery served as controls. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent postoperative refraction was +0.21 diopter (D) (SD, 1.54; range, -2.25 to +2.25 D) for patients undergoing cataract extraction after LASIK versus -0.56 D (SD, 0.66; range, -2.375 to +0.5 D; p= 0.16) for controls. Thirty percent of cases versus 90% of controls were within 1 D ( p= 0.002) of emmetropia. Forty percent of cases versus no controls were more than 1 D hyperopic ( p= 0.08). The mean differences for each method compared with the back-calculated K values were MK, +0.82 D; VK, +1.24 D; RH, -0.76 D; CTL, +0.91 D; AVG 2, +0.08 D. The mean absolute deviations from the back-calculated K values were MK, 1.91 D; VK, 2.01 D; RH, 1.68 D; CTL, 1.62 D; AVG 2, 1.42 D. CONCLUSION: Significant refractive errors occurred with each of the methods investigated for determining IOL power after LASIK. RH, CL, or AVG 2 provided the most accurate results.