Literature DB >> 12410014

Estimating the influence of rescreening interval on the benefits associated with cancer screening: approaches and limitations.

Noel S Weiss1, Ruth Etzioni.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT Randomized controlled trials that seek to measure the ability of a screening test to lower cancer mortality generally do not provide data that bear on the relative efficacy of different screening intervals. Guidance regarding the choice of a screening interval that achieves a high level of case-finding, without being excessively costly, can be obtained from one or more of several study designs that examine the subsequent occurrence of cancer in persons who have had a negative screening test. However, each of these can potentially provide a misleading result, and so their limitations must be considered before using the data they generate to develop a rational rescreening policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12410014     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200211000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  7 in total

1.  Quantifying the potential benefit of sigmoidoscopic rescreening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Noel S Weiss; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Effectiveness of gastric cancer screening programs in South Korea: organized vs opportunistic models.

Authors:  Beom Jin Kim; Chae Heo; Byoung Kwon Kim; Jae Yeol Kim; Jae Gyu Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  No Association Between Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Reduced Cancer-Related Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Andrew M Moon; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Feng Su; Samuel B Ho; Ga-Young Jin; Elliott Lowy; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?

Authors:  Sune Bangsbøll Andersen; Sven Törnberg; Sini Kilpeläinen; My Von Euler-Chelpin; Sisse Helle Njor
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Women's patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark.

Authors:  My von Euler-Chelpin; Anne Helene Olsen; Sisse Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Walter Schwartz; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Screening is associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma-related mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Feng Su; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Andrew M Moon; Ga-Young Jin; Pamela Green; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Early impact and performance characteristics of an established anal dysplasia screening program: program evaluation considerations.

Authors:  Christopher Mathews; Joseph Caperna; Edward R Cachay; Bard Cosman
Journal:  Open AIDS J       Date:  2007-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.