Literature DB >> 12408947

The impact of consumer-resource cycles on the coexistence of competing consumers.

Peter A Abrams1, Robert D Holt.   

Abstract

This article seeks to determine the extent to which endogenous consumer-resource cycles can contribute to the coexistence of competing consumer species. It begins with a numerical analysis of a simple model proposed by Armstrong and McGehee. This model has a single resource and two consumers, one with a linear functional response and one with a saturating response. Coexistence of the two consumer species can occur when the species with a saturating response generates population cycles of the resource, and also has a lower resource requirement for zero population growth. Coexistence can be achieved over a wide range of relative efficiencies of the two consumers provided that the functional response of the saturating consumer reaches its half-saturation value when the resource population is a small fraction of its carrying capacity. In this case, the range of efficiencies allowing coexistence is comparable to that when two competitors have stable dynamics and a high degree of resource partitioning. A variety of modifications of this basic model are analyzed to investigate the consequences for coexistence of different resource growth equations, different functional and numerical response shapes, and other factors. Large differences in functional response shape appear to be the most important factor in producing robust coexistence via resource cycles. If the unstable species has a concave numerical response, this greatly expands the conditions allowing coexistence. If the stable consumer species has a convex (accelerating) functional and/or numerical response, the range of conditions allowing coexistence is also expanded. We argue that large between-species differences in functional response form can often be produced by between-consumer differences in the adaptive adjustments of foraging effort to food density. Consumer-resource cycles can also expand the conditions allowing coexistence when there is resource partitioning, but do so primarily when resource partitioning is relatively slight; this makes the ease of coexistence relatively independent of consumer similarity.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12408947     DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  10 in total

1.  Deriving reaction-diffusion models in ecology from interacting particle systems.

Authors:  R S Cantrell; C Cosner
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  A baseline model for the co-evolution of hosts and pathogens.

Authors:  Rachel Bennett; Roger G Bowers
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Evolutionary rescue can maintain an oscillating community undergoing environmental change.

Authors:  Gregor F Fussmann; Andrew Gonzalez
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  A sterol-mediated gleaner-opportunist trade-off underlies the evolution of grazer resistance to cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Jana Isanta-Navarro; Toni Klauschies; Alexander Wacker; Dominik Martin-Creuzburg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Fundamental difference in life history traits of two species of Cataglyphis ants.

Authors:  Markus Knaden; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Rapid evolution of prey maintains predator diversity.

Authors:  Akihiko Mougi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of Temporal pH Fluctuations on the Coexistence of Nasal Bacteria in an in silico Community.

Authors:  Sandra Dedrick; M Javad Akbari; Samantha K Dyckman; Nannan Zhao; Yang-Yu Liu; Babak Momeni
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Trait adaptation promotes species coexistence in diverse predator and prey communities.

Authors:  Toni Klauschies; David A Vasseur; Ursula Gaedke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Habitat orientation alters the outcome of interspecific competition: A microcosm study with zooplankton grazers.

Authors:  Ying Pan; Yunshu Zhang; Shucun Sun
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Polyrhythmic foraging and competitive coexistence.

Authors:  Akihiko Mougi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.