Literature DB >> 12408777

Gemcitabine or gemcitabine plus cisplatin for in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Xingyuan Wang1, Quanxing Ni, Maolin Jin, Zhaoshen Li, Yuxin Wu, Yupei Zhao, Fengyi Feng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A multi-center randomized phase III clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy, clinical benefit response (CBR) and toxicity profile of germcitabine (GEM) or GEM plus cisplatin (CDDP) for locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).
METHODS: From July 2000 to May 2001, 42 untreated patients with LAPC or MPC were collected and randomized into two groups: Arm A-GEM 20 patients and Arm B-GEM + CDDP 22 patients. Eligibility criteria were: cytologically and pathologically proven pancreatic carcinoma, Karnosky performance status (KPS) 60 - 80, age 18 - 75 yrs, adequate hematological, renal and liver function, measurable disease, and controllable pain. For Arm A patients, weekly dose of GEM 1 000 mg/m(2)/w for 7 times followed by a week rest. Then weekly GEM at the same dose for 3 times every 4 weeks. Arm B patients were given weekly dose of GEM 1 000 mg/m(2)/w for 3 times every 4 weeks combined with CDDP 60 mg/m(2) on D15 for 3 cycles.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were available for objective response (Arm A 16 and Arm B 18) and 36 (Arm A 16 and Arm B 20) for CBR evaluation. In Arm A and Arm B, PR 1 (6.3%) and 2 (11%), MR 4 (25%) and 3 (16.7%), SD 7 (43.8%) and 8 (44.4%), PD 4 (25%) and 5 (27.8%), PR + MR 31.3% and 27.8%, PR + MR + SD 75% and 72.2% were observed. Positive CBR was 14/16 (87.5%) in Arm A and 14/20 (70.0%) in Arm B. The negative results was 2/16 (12.5%) in Arm A and 6/20 (30.0%) in Arm B. The median time of disease progression was not yet available at present. The 3-month survival rate of both Arm A and B was 100%, the 6-month survival rates of Arm A and B were 81.3% and 61.6% and the 12-month survival rates of Arm A and B was 31.3% and 11.1%, with median survivals of 273 and 217 days. The incidence of hematological and non-hematological toxicity of Arm A was lower than that of Arm B without statistical significance. The toxicity ranging from being mild to moderate was manageable.
CONCLUSION: GEM or GEM plus CDDP is able to lead to a moderate objective response rate, also significantly improve the quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, prolonging the survival time with tolerable toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12408777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi        ISSN: 0253-3766


  12 in total

Review 1.  Gemcitabine in Combination with a Second Cytotoxic Agent in the First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Wei Zhang; Yu-Xiang Ma; Yang Sun; Yu-Bo Cao; Qin Li; Chong-An Xu
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Meta-analysis on inoperable pancreatic cancer: a comparison between gemcitabine-based combination therapy and gemcitabine alone.

Authors:  De-Rong Xie; Han-Lin Liang; Yu Wang; Shuan-Shuan Guo; Qiong Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Elizabeth Hijona; Angel Cosme; Luis Bujanda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  NPTX1 inhibits pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration and enhances chemotherapy sensitivity by targeting RBM10.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Gaifang Liu; Kang An; Linping Shi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.111

Review 5.  Contemporary Management of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Walid L Shaib; Andrew Ip; Kenneth Cardona; Olatunji B Alese; Shishir K Maithel; David Kooby; Jerome Landry; Bassel F El-Rayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Moss; Clifton Lee
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A meta-analysis of gemcitabine containing chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Gang Zhao; Hong-Xia Wang; Lei Tang; Ying-Chun Xu; Yue Ma; Feng-Chun Zhang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 8.  Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Venessa Chin; Adnan Nagrial; Katrin Sjoquist; Chelsie A O'Connor; Lorraine Chantrill; Andrew V Biankin; Rob Jpm Scholten; Desmond Yip
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-20

9.  Meta-analyses of chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of secondary end points analyses.

Authors:  A Sultana; C Tudur Smith; D Cunningham; N Starling; J P Neoptolemos; P Ghaneh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Systemic treatment for inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: review and update.

Authors:  Stephen L Chan; Sin T Chan; Eric H Chan; Zhe-Xi He
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.