Literature DB >> 12408374

Prognostic value of residual node involvement in operable breast cancer after induction chemotherapy.

Hervé Curé1, Sophie Amat, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Guillaume le Bouëdec, Jean-Pierre Ferrière, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Fabrice Kwiatkowski, Viviane Feillel, Jacques Dauplat, Philippe Chollet.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the influence of axillary disease on patients' survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to assess patient and tumor characteristics associated with post-chemotherapy axillary involvement. After six induction cycles, 277 patients with operable breast cancer (stage II-III) underwent surgery with axillary dissection, followed by radiotherapy (n = 267) or additional chemotherapy (n = 63) and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (n = 138). At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed as a function of node involvement. The differences in OS and DFS according to the number of positive nodes were highly statistically significant with a decreased survival associated with the increasing number of nodes (p = 5 x 10(-6) and 9 x 10(-7), respectively). Upon multivariate analysis, the node number after chemotherapy appeared as the most significant prognostic factor (p = 7 x 10(-4) for OS and p = 3 x 10(-5) for DFS). All the other classical prognostic factors were insignificant, except post-chemotherapy Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grading for OS (p = 8 x 10(-4)) and adjuvant hormonotherapy for DFS (p = 1 x 10(-2)). Although constituting a different parameter from primary surgery data, the number of positive nodes after chemotherapy could still remain a valuable prognostic factor at secondary surgery, raising the question for high risk patients of a second non-cross-resistant adjuvant regimen, or high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12408374     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020274709327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

1.  Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  David Aguiar Bujanda; Uriel Bohn Sarmiento; Miguel Angel Cabrera Suárez; Marta Pavcovich Ruiz; Miguel Angel Limeres González; José Aguiar Morales
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy using dye alone method is reliable and accurate even after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer--a prospective study.

Authors:  Megha Tandon; Ashwani Mishra; Usha Agarwal; Sunita Saxena
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase breast conservation in operable breast cancer: an Egyptian experience.

Authors:  N Abdel-Bary; Af El-Kased; Haz Aiad
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2009-04-09

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: pathologic complete response rate, predictive and prognostic factors.

Authors:  I P C Buzatto; A Ribeiro-Silva; J M Andrade; H H A Carrara; W A Silveira; D G Tiezzi
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer?

Authors:  P Chollet; S Amat; E Belembaogo; H Curé; M de Latour; J Dauplat; G Le Bouëdec; M-A Mouret-Reynier; J-P Ferrière; F Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Fei Fu; Hai-Long Chen; Jiao Yang; Cheng-Hao Yi; Shu Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.