Literature DB >> 12408297

Dosimetry comparison of 192Ir sources.

P Papagiannis1, A Angelopoulos, E Pantelis, L Sakelliou, D Baltas, P Karaiskos, P Sandilos, L Vlachos.   

Abstract

192Ir sources besides being widely utilized in the field of conventional brachytherapy also find use in contemporary peripheral and coronal intravascular applications. In this study, the same Monte Carlo simulation code and input data were used to investigate differences between the dose rate distributions of the most commonly used 192Ir sources in the cm and mm distance range. Findings are discussed in view of differences in source and encapsulation dimensions as well as structural details. Results are presented in the AAPM TG-43 formalism, as generalized by AAPM TG-60, for five 192Ir HDR source designs as well as an LDR seed and an LDR wire source. Dose rate constants of the sources at r0 = 1 cm and r0 = 2 mm were found proportional to the corresponding geometry factors along the transverse source bisectors and an equation of the form lambda r0(cGyh(-1) U(-1)) = 1.12 x G(r0,90 degrees) provides results within clinical accuracy (less than 2%) for any 192Ir source. Radial dose functions do not depend significantly on source and encapsulation geometry and agree within 2% with that of a point 192Ir source. Anisotropy is of importance for accurate dosimetry at the cm distance range but it does not affect dose rate in the mm distance range significantly. At such short radial distances the source geometry factor defines the shape of isodose lines. Dose uniformity at given distances from the sources is strongly dependent on source dimensions as indicated by dose rate profiles in polar and Cartesian coordinates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12408297     DOI: 10.1118/1.1508378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Dosimetric characteristics of the ¹⁹²Ir high-dose-rate afterloading brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Mahdi Sadeghi; Fatemah Taghdiri; Pooneh Saidi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  An analytic approach to the dosimetry of a new BEBIG (60)Co high-dose-rate brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Subhalaxmi Bhola; T Palani Selvam; Sahoo Sridhar; Ramkrishna S Vishwakarma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-07

3.  Accuracy Evaluation of Oncentra™ TPS in HDR Brachytherapy of Nasopharynx Cancer Using EGSnrc Monte Carlo Code.

Authors:  K Hadad; M Zohrevand; R Faghihi; A Sedighi Pashaki
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2015-03-04

4.  Physics-aspects of dose accuracy in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: source dosimetry, treatment planning, equipment performance and in vivo verification techniques.

Authors:  Antony Palmer; David Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-30

5.  Dose distributions of an ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy source in different media.

Authors:  C H Wu; Y J Liao; Y W Hsueh Liu; S K Hung; M S Lee; S M Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Evaluation of wall correction factor of INER's air-kerma primary standard chamber and dose variation by source displacement for HDR ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy.

Authors:  J H Lee; J N Wang; T T Huang; S H Su; B J Chang; C H Su; S M Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of TG-43 dosimetric parameters of brachytherapy sources obtained by three different versions of MCNP codes.

Authors:  Neda Zaker; Mehdi Zehtabian; Sedigheh Sina; Craig Koontz; Ali S Meigooni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.