Literature DB >> 12407945

Craniofacial differences between Japanese and British Caucasian females with a skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Nobuyuki Ishii1, Toshio Deguchi, Nigel P Hunt.   

Abstract

The racial differences in the craniofacial structures of 28 Japanese and 24 British Caucasian females with Class III malocclusions associated with a severe skeletal pattern were examined using lateral cephalograms. The mean age of the Japanese and Caucasian patients was 19.6 +/- 3.5 and 20.2 +/- 3.8 years (+/- SD), respectively. The mean values of 14 linear and 13 angular cephalometric parameters were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the Japanese females had a significantly reduced anterior cranial base (P < 0.01), a more retrusive midfacial component (P < 0.05), and a significantly increased lower anterior facial height (P < 0.01) associated with a more obtuse gonial angle (P < 0.05) compared with the Caucasians. Analysis of the dento-alveolar component in Japanese patients indicated more proclined upper incisors (P < 0.01) compared with those of Caucasian subjects. The reduced anterior cranial base and midfacial component, and the high-angle facial pattern in the Japanese population, may be morphological features based on race, and these skeletal features seem to be less favourable for a skeletal Class III growth pattern compared with the Caucasian population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407945     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/24.5.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  [Anomalies of the skull in cleidocranial dysplasia].

Authors:  I Golan; A Waldeck; U Baumert; J Strutz; D Müssig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Morphometric analysis of the cranial base in Asians.

Authors:  Hong-Po Chang; Pao-Hsin Liu; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Yi-Hsin Yang; Chin-Yun Pan; Szu-Ting Chou
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Michael Proctor; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Does Gender Have an Effect on Craniofacial Measurements?

Authors:  Lale Taner; Gamze Metin Gürsoy; Fatma Deniz Uzuner
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

5.  Cephalometric Evaluation of Dentofacial Features of Class III Malocclusion in Adults of Mashhad, Iran.

Authors:  Baratali Ramezanzadeh; Maryam Pousti; Mansour Bagheri
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2007-12-20

6.  Surgical-orthodontic treatment of a skeletal class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Radha Katiyar; G K Singh; Divya Mehrotra; Alka Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-07

7.  Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships.

Authors:  Susan N Al-Khateeb; Emad F Al Maaitah; Elham S Abu Alhaija; Serene A Badran
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Assessing anteroposterior basal bone discrepancy with the Dental Aesthetic Index.

Authors:  Boyen Huang; Katsu Takahashi; Toru Yamazaki; Kazuyuki Saito; Masashi Yamori; Keita Asai; Yusuke Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Kamioka; Takashi Yamashiro; Kazuhisa Bessho
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Morphological features of Class I, II and III malocclusions of Saudi adolescents.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ayman A Al-Dharrab; Ahmed R Afify; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Hosam A Baeshen
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Inheritance of craniofacial features in Colombian families with class III malocclusion.

Authors:  L Otero; L Quintero; D Champsaur; E Simanca
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2010-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.